摘要
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of clinical application of a novel type of vascular closure device named Boomerang closure wire system （BCWS）. Methods BCWSs were hemostasis after transfemoral coronary angiography （CAG） or percutaneous used in 288 patients （BCWSs group） for coronary intervention （PCI）. Device success rate, hemostasis success rate, manual compression time, recumbent time, minor peripheral complication rate, severe peripheral complication rate and hospital staying time after procedure were analyzed. Results were compared to those from 300 patients （control group） who received manual compression in our hospital during the same period Results In BCWS group, device success rate was 97.2 %, hemostasis success rate was 95.1%. Manual compression time in CAG subgroup and PCI subgroup was 7.8 min and 11.2 min, respectively. Recumbent time was 136. 3 min in CAG subgroup, 284.6 min in PCI subgroup. Minor peripheral complication rate was 4.5 %, severe peripheral complication rate was 2. 4 %. Hospital-staying time after procedure in CAG group and PCI group was 1.8 d and 6. 6 d, respectively. Compared to control group, manual compression time, recumbent time and hospital-staying time of BCWSs group had statistical significance; hemostasis success rate, minor peripheral complication rate and severe peripheral complication rate of BCWSs group had no statistical difference. Conclusions BCWS provides satisfied haemostatic effect. Compared to routine manual compression, BCWS shortens manual compression time, recumbent time and hospital staying time. （ S Chin J Cardiol 2009; 10（1） ： 19 -22）
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of clinical application of a novel type of vascular closure device named Boomerang closure wire system （BCWS）. Methods BCWSs were hemostasis after transfemoral coronary angiography （CAG） or percutaneous used in 288 patients （BCWSs group） for coronary intervention （PCI）. Device success rate, hemostasis success rate, manual compression time, recumbent time, minor peripheral complication rate, severe peripheral complication rate and hospital staying time after procedure were analyzed. Results were compared to those from 300 patients （control group） who received manual compression in our hospital during the same period Results In BCWS group, device success rate was 97.2 %, hemostasis success rate was 95.1%. Manual compression time in CAG subgroup and PCI subgroup was 7.8 min and 11.2 min, respectively. Recumbent time was 136. 3 min in CAG subgroup, 284.6 min in PCI subgroup. Minor peripheral complication rate was 4.5 %, severe peripheral complication rate was 2. 4 %. Hospital-staying time after procedure in CAG group and PCI group was 1.8 d and 6. 6 d, respectively. Compared to control group, manual compression time, recumbent time and hospital-staying time of BCWSs group had statistical significance; hemostasis success rate, minor peripheral complication rate and severe peripheral complication rate of BCWSs group had no statistical difference. Conclusions BCWS provides satisfied haemostatic effect. Compared to routine manual compression, BCWS shortens manual compression time, recumbent time and hospital staying time. （ S Chin J Cardiol 2009; 10（1） ： 19 -22）
