期刊文献+

保留乳头乳晕复合体的改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌患者疗效分析 被引量:41

Efficacy of modified radical operation of preserving nipple-areolar complex on early stage breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的:保留乳头乳晕复合体(nipple-areolar complex,NAC)对乳腺癌患者乳房重建的美容效果和术后生活质量有重要意义。但保留NAC改良根治术治疗早期(Ⅰ、Ⅱa期)乳腺癌的肿瘤学风险一直存在着争论。本研究比较保留NAC的改良根治术与传统改良根治性手术治疗早期乳腺癌疗效。方法:在1998年1月~2003年12月间在我院接受手术的早期乳腺癌患者中,根据发病年龄、腋窝淋巴结状态、激素受体情况、肿块大小和Her-2/neu的表达状态5个变量对42例接受保留NAC改良根治术患者和84例接受传统改良根治术患者的按1∶2比例进行配对的回顾性队列研究。比较两组的局部区域复发率、远处转移率、总生存率和无瘤生存率。结果:保留NAC组中位随访时间为48个月,传统改良根治组为44个月。保留NAC组5年局部区域复发率为2.44%,传统改良根治组3.21%,两者差异无统计学意义(P=0.771)。保留NAC组5年远处转移率为5.64%,传统改良根治组为4.30%,两者差异无统计学意义(P=0.654)。保留NAC组和传统改良根治组5年总生存率分别为96.00%和98.18%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.694);5年无瘤生存率分别为91.67%和92.26%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.597)。结论:在严格把握适应症基础上行保留NAC改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌可以和传统的改良根治术取得相似的治疗效果,但可以增强患者乳房重建的美容效果和提高术后生活质量。 Background and Objective: Modified radical mastectomy of preserving nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is an important surgical therapy for stage I-Ila breast cancer, but the oncological risk is controversial. This study was to compare the efficacy of NAC-preserving modified radical operation and conventional modified radical operation on early stage breast cancer. Methods.. The patients who received NAC-preserving modified radical operation (42 patients) or conventional modified radical operation (84 patients) from January 1998 to December 2003 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College were matched with a ratio of 1:2 by age at diagnosis, axillary lymph node status, sexual hormone receptor status, tumor size and Her-2/neu expression for retrospective analysis. The Iocoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) between the two groups were compared. Results: Median follow-up time was 48 months in NAC-preserving operation group and 44 months in conventional operation group. The 5-year occurrence rate of Ioco-regional recurrence was 2.44% in NAC-preserving operation group and 3.21% in conventional operation group (P = 0.771). The 5-year occurrence rate of distant metastasis was 5.64% in NAC-preserving operation group and 4.30% in conventional operation group (P = 0.654). The 5-year OS rates were 96.00% in NAC-preserving operation group and 98.18% in conventional operation group (P=0.694). The 5-year DFS rates were 91.67% in NAC-preserving operation group and 92.26% in conventional operation group (P=0.597). Conclusion: Modified NAC-preserving radical operation results in the same effect on early stage breast cancer as conventional modified radical operation based on careful consideration of the indications, and results in better cosmetic appearance after restitution and better quality of life.
出处 《癌症》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期408-411,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cancer
基金 安徽省蚌埠市科委资助项目(No.2005-18)~~
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 外科手术 改良根治术 乳头乳晕复合体 疗效 breast neoplasm, surgical operation, modified radical operation, nipple-areolar complex, efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Cense HA, Rutgers EJ, Lopes-Cardozo M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2001,27(6) :521-526.
  • 2Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure[J]. Ann Surg, 2003,238( 1 ) : 120-127.
  • 3王圣应,鲁智,程新德,张荣新,张宗新,田怀杲,韩福生,邓军.早期乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕复合体的改良根治术——Ⅰ期腹直肌肌皮瓣重建乳房[J].癌症,2004,23(1):56-59. 被引量:17
  • 4Lossing C, Brongo S, Holmstrom H. Nipple reconstruction with a modified S-flap technique [J]. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 1998,32 ( 3 ) : 275-279.
  • 5Verma GR, Kumar A, Joshi K. Nipple involvement in peripheral breast carcinoma: a prospective study [J]. Indian J Cancer, 1997,34(1) : 1-5.
  • 6Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, et al. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2002,9(2):165-168.
  • 7王圣应,彭德峰,蔡兆根,张荣新,姚廷敬,张晖,杨明,董慧明.早期乳腺癌乳头乳晕复合体隐匿癌浸润的临床病理研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2008,30(3):203-206. 被引量:16
  • 8Kissin MW, Kark AE. Nipple preservation during mastectomy [J]. Br J Surg, 1987,74( 1 ):58-61.
  • 9马榕.保留乳头改良根治术治疗乳腺癌的近期疗效[J].中华外科杂志,2000,38:282-282.
  • 10姚成才,叶彼德,郭耐强,钱浩勇,廖洪叶.保留乳头乳晕复合体的皮下乳腺癌改良根治术后Ⅰ期假体乳房再造术的探讨[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(9):683-684. 被引量:10

二级参考文献15

  • 1傅俊惠,柯斌,杨楚徐,黄培生,黄建豪,郑海波,郑春鹏,吴智勇.保留皮肤及乳头乳晕的皮下乳腺癌改良根治术同期乳房重建32例报告[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(1):54-55. 被引量:21
  • 2Jatoi I, Proschan MA. Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol, 2005, 25:259-294.
  • 3Lagios MD, Gates EA, Westdahl PR, et al. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer, a study of 149 consecutive mastectomies using a serial subgross and correlated radiographic technique. Am J Surg, 1979, 138:135-142.
  • 4Santini D, Taffurelli M, GeUi MC, et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg, 1989, 158:399-403.
  • 5Verma GR, Kumar A, Joshi K. Nipple involvement in peripheral breast earcinoma t a prospective study. Indian J Cancer. 1997, 34 : 1-5.
  • 6Kissin MW, Kark AE. Nipple preservation during mastectomy, Br J Surg, 1987, 74:58-61.
  • 7Fisher ER, Costantino J, Fisher B, et al. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol 4 ): dlscriminants for 15-year survival. National Surgical Adju,zant Breast and Bowel Project Investigators. Cancer, J993, 71 :2141-2150.
  • 8Dale PS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-areolar preservation during breastconserving therapy for subareolar breast carcinomas. Arch Surg, 1996, 131:430-433.
  • 9Cunnick GH,Mokbel K.Skin-sparing mastectomy.Am J Surg,2004,188:78-84.
  • 10Medina-Franco H,Vasconez LO,Fix RJ,et al.Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer.Ann Surg,2002,235:814-819.

共引文献40

同被引文献347

引证文献41

二级引证文献221

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部