期刊文献+

基于SFA效率值的我国开放式基金绩效评价研究 被引量:26

A Study on the Performance Evaluation of Chinese Open-ended Funds Based on SFA Efficiency Value
原文传递
导出
摘要 线性因子定价模型的回归残差一般不服从正态分布,这会导致以其为基础的基金绩效评价指标存在一定的缺陷,投资者根据这些指标无法选择合适的基金进行投资,而SFA效率值指标则考虑到了上述缺陷。本文在Carhart四因子模型的基础上,选取2005年1月~2008年7月期间74只开放式基金的数据,使用随机前沿分析方法对我国开放式基金的绩效评价问题进行了考察。结果表明,我国开放式基金存在显著的技术非效率,常用绩效指标之间具有排序不一致性问题,SFA效率值指标与基于常用绩效指标的综合性指标之间具有很高的相关性。 The regression residuals of linear factor pricing models often have not normal distribution. This fact will result that the performance evaluation indicators based on them have some shortcomings and investors can't choose satisfactory funds to invest according to these indicators. But SFA efficiency value considers this fact. This paper uses Carhart four-factor model and chooses the data of 74 open-ended funds from 2005 M1 to 2008 M7 to investigate the performance evaluation problem of Chinese open-ended fund based on stochastic frontier analysis. The results show that our open-ended funds have technological non-efficiency significantly and there is an inconsistency problem of performance rank according to the common indictors. SFA efficiency value indicator is highly related with the synthetic indicator based on the common indictors.
作者 朱波 宋振平
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期105-116,共12页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
关键词 开放式基金 SFA效率值 Carhart四因子模型 Open-ended Fund SFA Efficiency Value Carhart Four-factor Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

二级参考文献109

  • 1杨宽.证券投资基金绩效的评价[J].探求,2005(3):51-53. 被引量:2
  • 2单耀文,徐剑刚.PPW模型、GT整体检验对基金选股能力的再考察[J].系统工程,2004,22(5):66-69. 被引量:3
  • 3庞杰.中国封闭式基金的绩效评价[J].统计与信息论坛,2006,21(5):100-103. 被引量:2
  • 4威廉·F·夏普 赵锡军等(译).投资学(第五版)[M].中国人民大学出版社,1998..
  • 5刘力 宋希武.《中国股市过度反应研究》.北京大学光华管理学院工作论文[M].,2000..
  • 6Cuthbertson K,Nitzsche D.《数量金融经济学》.朱波译,西南财经大学出版社,2008年.
  • 7Jensen M, "The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964". Journal of Finance. 1968, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp.389-416.
  • 8Brown S, Goetzmann W, Ibbotson R, Ross S, "Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies". Review of Financial Studies, 1992, No. 5, pp.553-580.
  • 9Grinblatt M, Titman S, "The Persistence of Mutual Fund Performance", Journal of Finance, 1992, Vol. 47, pp. 1977-1984.
  • 10Hendricks D, Patel J, Zeckhauser R, “Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short-Run Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974-1988”, Journal of Finance, 1993,Vol. 48, No. 3, pp.93-130.

共引文献534

同被引文献334

引证文献26

二级引证文献179

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部