摘要
针对群体性行政诉讼,法院采用了两种不同的诉讼模式——代表人诉讼和分别诉讼,而理论界倾向于用代表人诉讼模式来解决群体性行政纠纷。分析两种诉讼模式,它们各有利弊,功能和价值各有侧重,应该共同为解决群体性行政纠纷服务,具体如何选择则需要法院来考量。另一方面,为更好地解决群体性行政纠纷,还需要建立相关的配套制度。
On the group administration litigation,the court has adopted two different litigation modes——representative litigation and separate litigation,but the theoretical circle is apt to the representative litigation.Analyzing the two modes,they both have their advantages and disadvantages,focus on different functions and values,so,they should serve for solving the group administration disputes together.And,how to choose in concrete circumstance is due to the court.On the other hand,in order to solve the group administration disputes better,we should construct some matching systems.
出处
《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第1期28-32,共5页
Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
关键词
群体性行政诉讼
代表人诉讼
分别诉讼
group administration litigation
representative litigation
separate litigation