期刊文献+

知识产权拒绝许可的反垄断法规制 被引量:2

General theory on Antimonopoly restriction of refusal to deal of IP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 知识产权拒绝许可是知识产权人合法行使权利的方式之一,是受法律保护的任何第三人不得任意干涉的合法权利。但是知识产权人如果滥用该权利限制了相关市场的有效竞争,意图巩固和加强自己的垄断地位,则会引起反垄断法的规制,承担反垄断法上的责任。 Refusal to deal of IP is one of legal behavior forms of IP person' s rights exertion, it is a legal right which is protected by law and nobody should intervene. However, if IP person abuse the right to confine the virtual com- petition, in order to strengthen monopoly status, it will be restricted by Antimonopoly law and assumes obligation of Antimonopoly law.
作者 曹伟 吴叶青
出处 《河南司法警官职业学院学报》 2009年第1期64-66,共3页 Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
关键词 知识产权 拒绝许可 基础设施规则 反垄断法 IP refusal to deal essential facility doctrine Antimonopoly Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS:Promoting Innovation OF JUSTICE AND THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/hearings/ip/222655.pdf.
  • 2我国《反垄断法(草案)》(2006年6月国务院提交全国人大常委会审议稿)第3条.
  • 3Constance E.Bagley,and Gavin Clarkson.AdversePossession for Intellectual Property[].Har-vard Journal of Law&Technology.2003
  • 4.Colonial Penn Group v.American Ass’n of Re-tiredPersons[].FSupp.1988
  • 5Apartment Source of Philadelphia v PhiladelphiaNewspapers. Civ.A.No.98-5472 . 1999
  • 6Hecht v.Pro-Football,Inc. 570 F.2d 982,992-93 . 1977
  • 7.City of Anaheim[].Fd.
  • 8.
  • 9Aspen Skiing Co.v.Aspen Highlands SkiingCorp. 472 U.S.585,594-95 . 1985
  • 10.City of Anaheim v.SCal.Edison Co[].Fd n.1992

共引文献13

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部