摘要
我国首例教育法庭实际上是"特别专审非独立型"教育审判机构模式的一种尝试。作为特殊历史阶段的改革伴生物,这一模式与我国当下的"兼审非独立型"教育司法审查模式相比较,特殊之处就在于其形式上的"独立性"和实质上的"半司法半行政"特点。随着我国现阶段涉诉教育案件日趋复杂化和专门化,教育审判组织和从业人员亦需要走向独立化和专职化。因此,反思我国首例教育法庭的经验和教训,根据各国教育司法实践,中国特色的"普通专审相对独立型"教育法庭当为我国未来教育司法审判模式改革的理性选择。
The first education court in our country essentially was an attempt of "non-independent special trial" by educational judicial organs. As an outcome of reform during special historical period, it was independent in form yet half judicial and half administrative in essence when compared with prevalent educational judicial review of "non-independent concurrent trial". With the law case relating to education being more complicated and specialized, it is demanded that educational trial organizers and practitioners should be independent and professional. Therefore, when we reflect the first education law in our country and borrow useful experience abroad,we should rationally choose the mode of "relative independent common special trial".
出处
《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2009年第1期84-90,共7页
Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
基金
全国教育科学"十五"规划重点课题(EGB030514)
关键词
教育法庭
半司法半行政性质
特别专审非独立型
education law
half judicial and half administrative
non-independent special trial