期刊文献+

干旱区农田不同利用强度下土壤质量评价 被引量:25

Assessment of farmland soil quality under different utilization intensity in arid area
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于2005—2007年典型干旱区塔里木盆地南缘的策勒绿洲的试验数据,根据当地农民的耕作习惯选择4种典型的农田利用强度(高投入农田、常规投入农田、新垦农田和绿洲内部农户农田),利用产量可持续性指数(SYI)、土壤改良指数(SI)和土壤综合质量指数(QI)分析了不同土地利用强度下农田土壤质量的变化情况.结果表明:各样地的土壤有机质(SOM)、碱解氮(AN)和速效磷(AP)含量均存在显著差别;位于绿洲边缘的新垦农田在所有评价中均处于最低水平,而绿洲内部农田则处于相对较高水平.本研究结果不但有利于当地农田的合理开发利用,同时有利于农田生态环境的保护. Based on the 2005-2007 experimental data in Cele oasis in the southern margin of Tarim Basin of Xinjiang, the soil quality of four typical types of farmland with different utilization intensity, i. e. , farmland with high input, farmland with normal input, newly reclaimed farmland, and farmland in oasis' interior, was analyzed and assessed by using sustainable yield index, soil improvement index, and soil quality synthesis index. Among the farmlands, there were significant differences in the contents of soil organic matter, available nitrogen, and available phosphorus. Newly reclaimed farmland had the lowest level of soil quality, while the farmland in oasis' interior had relatively higher soil quality. This study could help the reasonable exploitation and utilization of farmlands in Cele oasis, and the protection of local farmland eco-environment.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期894-900,共7页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2009CB421302) 新疆自治区科技攻关项目(200633130) 新疆自治科技重大专项(200733144-2)资助
关键词 干旱区 绿洲 农田 土壤质量 策勒 arid area oasis farmland soil quality Cele.
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1郑昭佩,刘作新.土壤质量及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):131-134. 被引量:189
  • 2张桃林,潘剑君,赵其国.土壤质量研究进展与方向[J].土壤,1999,31(1):1-7. 被引量:118
  • 3Doran JW, Parkin TB. Defining and assessing soil quality. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994, 58: 1039 - 1054.
  • 4Karlen DL, Mausbach M J, Doran JW, et al. Soil quality : A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1997, 61 : 4-10.
  • 5Larson WE, Pierce FJ. Conservation and enhancement of soil quality, in evaluation for sustainable land management in the developing world. International Board for Soil Research and Management, Bangkok, 1991: 175-203.
  • 6Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Mitchell JP. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2002, 90:25-45.
  • 7de Lima ACR, Hoogmoed W, Brussaard L. Soil quality assessment in rice production systems: Establishing a minimum data set. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2008, 37:623-630.
  • 8Karlen DL, Tomer MD, Neppel J. A preliminary watershed scale soil quality assessment in north central Iowa, USA. Soil & Tillage Research, 2008, 99:291-299.
  • 9Shukla MK, Lal R, Ebinger M. Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis. Soil & Tillage Research, 2006, 87:194-214.
  • 10Herrick JE. Soil quality: An indicator of sustainable land management? Applied Soil Ecology, 2000, 15 : 75-83.

二级参考文献151

共引文献986

同被引文献511

引证文献25

二级引证文献301

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部