论疑罪不诉的法理争议与现实困境

On the Legal Disputes and Real Dilemma of no Prosecute for Suspected Crimes

疑罪不诉的核心价值是对无罪推定原则的直接践行,是对我国司法实践中疑罪从轻传统思想的否定与制约,同时疑罪不诉有利于保障犯罪嫌疑人权利,节约司法资源。疑罪不诉在法理上产生的争议都与疑罪不诉的理论价值密切相关。司法实践中,证据不足标准难以理解把握,侦查机关补充侦查缺乏实际效果,疑罪不诉所产生的巨大社会反应等是疑罪不诉的现实困境。解决疑罪不诉理论缺陷与现实困境,应取消单独条款的疑罪不诉规定,作为法定不起诉的情形之一;加强证据不足特点与原因研究,明确证据不足的判断标准;明确规定疑罪不诉不应承担国家赔偿责任;通过司法审查疑罪不诉决定,保障被害人权利。

The core values of no prosecute for suspected crimes is direct practicing to the principle of the presumption of innocence, negative the traditional thinking of lighter suspect crimes in our justice practice, and no prosecute for suspected crimes strongly protect the suspect＇ s right, save justice resource. The legal disputes on no prosecute for suspected crimes closely relate the theory values of no prosecute for suspected crimes. In judicial practices, the real dilemma of no prosecute for suspected crimes includes that the standard of lack evidence is difficult to understand and practice , the supplementary investigations of crime investigation agency lack actual results, the large social responses. Solving the legal dispute and real dilemma of no prosecute for suspected crimes should cancel separate terms on no preseeute for suspected crimes, only as one of situation on legal no prosecute ; strengthen research on the characteristics and reasons of lack evidence, clear the standards of lack evidences , clearly stipulates no prosecute for suspected crimes should not be under the state compensation ; through judicial reviewing no prosecute for suspected crimes to protect victims＇ rights.