在债权形式主义背景下无权处分与合同的效力归属

Unauthorized disposition and attribution of contract effect under the creditors' formalism

随着《物权法》的颁布实施,立法对物权变动主要模式的确立,以及我国立法对债权行为与物权行为划分的承认与严格区分,《合同法》第51条所确立的无权处分规定与其他法律规定存在的冲突已客观存在,并且此规则定与客观实践相抵触。无权处分规定涵需改革:有无处分权应成为物权行为及物权变动效力的判断因素,而非影响债权合同效力的要件。

With the implementation of property Law, the establishment of legislation for the main real right alternation mode and the recognition and strict distinction of claiming behavior and juristic act of real right, the conflict between the rule of unauthorized disposition which established by article 51 of Contract Law and other related legal provisions has been an objective reality, and this rule is in conflict with practice. The rule of unauthorized disposition needs reforming. The right of disposition should be the criterion of juristic act of real right and effect of real right alternation and not be the essentials of influencing creditor＇ rights effect.