期刊文献+

对立抑或融合的选择——也论确证的内在主义与外在主义

Choice of Contrary or Integration between Internalism and Externalism
原文传递
导出
摘要 当代知识论中,内在主义与外在主义一直被视为对立的两个范畴,事实上,它们确定两种认识上的不同进路和视角。一味强调它们的对立性,似乎无形中失去了实现两者后出现新趋势的可能。论文通过概念的扩展、可靠主义解释,以及认识实践进路的消解尝试,认为两者的表面对立中并非只有困境,更有融合的选择。 Internalism and Externalism in the contemporary epistemology (theory of knowledge) are taken as a pair of contrary categories, but they are just two types of different approaches and perspectives to knowledge. Should we emphasize much on their contrariness, there will lose possibility of the new tendency of integrating both sides. The paper, through expanding the relative concepts, explaining reliabilism and the epistemic practice holds that the ostensible contrary does not mean the mere predicament, but the choice of integration.
作者 方环非
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期14-18,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 确证 内在主义 外在主义 可靠主义 justification internalism externalism reliabilism
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Becker Kelly. Epistemic Luck and the Generality Problem [J]. Philosophical Studies, DOI 10. 1007/s 11098 --007-- 9122--z. 2.
  • 2Alston William, An Internalist Externalism[C]. Synthese, 1988(74) :265--283.
  • 3Floridi Luciano. on the Logical Unsolvability of the Gettier Problem[J']. Synthese,2004,142: 61--79.
  • 4方环非.知识论中的“回溯问题”与“确证”的回应[J].自然辩证法通讯,2007,29(4):20-25. 被引量:1
  • 5Goldman A I. Immediate Justification and Process Reliabilism, in Epistemology: New Essays[C]// Q Smith(ed. ). Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • 6Schmitt Frederick. Review of Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis[J]. Mind, New Series, 1992,101(403): 555--559.
  • 7Craig Edward. Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
  • 8McBain James. Epistemological Practice and the Internalism/Externalism Debate[J]. Facta Philosophica, 2005, 7 (2).
  • 9Neta Ram. Epistemology Factualized: New Contractarian Foundations for Epistemology[J]. Synthese, 2006 (150): 247--280.
  • 10Sosa, Ernest (1991), Reliabilism and Intellectual Virtue, in Knowledge in Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp131--145.

二级参考文献22

  • 1吕旭龙.确证的困境与超越的可能[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2005,32(2):94-98. 被引量:2
  • 2Laurence Bonjour and Ernest Sosa, Epistemic Justification[M], Blackwell Publishing, 2003, 7.
  • 3尼古拉斯·贝宁,余纪元编著,西方哲学英汉对照词典[M],北京:人民出版社,2001年2月,532.
  • 4Paul K. Moser, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology[M], Oxford University Press,2002,204.
  • 5Alvin I. Goldman, Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, the MIT Press, 1991, 105- 125.
  • 6Paul K. Moser, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology[M], Oxford University Press,2002, 205 - 206.
  • 7Stewart Cohen, Justification and Truth, Philosophical Studies, Vol.46 (3) 1984, 279- 295.
  • 8Paul K. Moser, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology[M], Oxford University Press,2002,206.
  • 9Paul K. Moser, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology[M], Oxford University Press,2002,206-207.
  • 10Richard Feldman, Epistemology [M], Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003, 73.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部