期刊文献+

也谈“关于不可计算问题”——与张本祥先生商榷

Some Thoughts on "On Incomputable Problem "
原文传递
导出
摘要 实数是不可数的,其涵义是实数的个数严格多于自然数的个数,即自然数集的势为0,而实数集的势为2 0。实数不可数结论是Cantor对数学理论的一大贡献,由此Cantor还解决了长期困扰数学家的难题———超越数的存在。张本祥先生搞混了实数的"不可数"和"不可计算"两个概念,从张文对"不可计算"的模糊定义和实数的不可数无法得到人们关注的地震可否预报的结果。实数是不可数的,但尚无"实数不可计算"的说法,科学在发展,技术在进步,随着信息科学和技术的飞速发展,将来终有一天地震预报成为可能。 Real number is uncountable, which means the number of the real is more than natural numbers. The cardinality for natural number is ,and the cardinality for the real number is. The real number is uncountable is draw by Cantor which made contribution to the mathematical theory, then Cantor solved the difficult problem-the existence of transcendental numbers, which puzzles the mathematicians for a long time. MR Zhang mixed the concepts of the uncountable and the incomputable for the real number. It can't the forecasting results of the earthquake from the fuzzy definition for the uncountable and the ineomputable of the real number. The real number is uncountable, which is uncertain about the real number is ineomputable. As the development of the science and the technology, The prediction for the earthquake will come true in the future.
作者 王汝发
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期103-107,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 实数 不可数 不可计算 地震预报 real number uncountable incomputable earthquake prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1张本祥.关于不可计算问题——从汶川大地震的预报问题谈起[J].自然辩证法研究,2008,24(10):93-97. 被引量:2
  • 2王建午 曹之江 刘景麟.实数的构造理论[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1981..
  • 3百度百科编辑.可计算理论[EB/OL].http://baike.baidu.com/view/117790.html?fromTaglist
  • 4南开大学数学系统计预报科研小组.预测大地震的一种数学方法.地球物理学报,1975,18(2):118-126.
  • 5王梓坤 朱成熹 李漳南 等.地质迁移的统计预报.地质科学,1973,(4):294-306.
  • 6蒋通.地震预报缘何成为世界难题[N].解放日报,2008-06-02.
  • 7赵倩.新一代监测仪有望准确预报地震[N].成都商报,2008-10-21.
  • 8陈运泰.地震预测——进展、困难与前景[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2007,28(2):1-24. 被引量:71

二级参考文献128

  • 1陈运泰.地震预测研究概况[J].地震学刊,1993,13(1):17-23. 被引量:27
  • 2张四昌,刁桂苓.华北地区的共轭地震构造带[J].华北地震科学,1995,13(4):1-8. 被引量:26
  • 3吴开统 岳明生 等.海城地震序列的特征[J].地球物理学报,1976,19(2):95-109.
  • 4Knopoff L. 1999. Earthquake prediction is difficult but not impossible[J]. Nature, Debates, March 11, 1999, 6pp
  • 5Knopoff L, Aki K, Allen C R, Rice J R and Sykes L R (eds). 1996. Earthquake Prediction: The Scientific Challenge, Colloquium Proceedings[J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci, USA, 93, 3 719-3 837
  • 6Kossobokov V G, Romashkova L L, Keilis-Borok V I and Healy J H. 1999. Testing earthquake prediction algorithms: Statistically significant advance prediction of the largest earthquakes in the circum-Pacific, 1992-1997[J]. Phys Earth Planet Interi, 111, 187-196
  • 7Lindh A G. 1983. Preliminary Assessment of Long-Term Probabilities for Large Earthquakes along Selected Fault Segments of the San Andreas Fault System in California[M]. U. S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Report 83-63, Menlo Park, California, 15pp
  • 8Lindh A G. 2003. The nature of earthquake prediction[J]. Seism Res Lett, 74, 723-735
  • 9Lindh A G. 2005. Success and failure at Parkfield[J]. Seism Res Lett, 76, 3-6
  • 10Matsumura S. 1997. Focal zone of a future Tokai earthquake inferred from the seismicity pattern around the plate interface [J]. Tectonophysics, 273, 271-291

共引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部