期刊文献+

公路路域景观美学评价 被引量:9

Assessment of Highway Roadside Landscape Aesthetics
原文传递
导出
摘要 公路路域景观美学感知是营造高质量公路景观环境的重要内容之一。基于公路使用者角度,采用"心理物理学"法定量评价了不同公路路域景观组成的美学感知状况。研究发现:公路路域景观美学质量与人工设施特色性、公路与人工设施距离、人工设施与周围环境融合度、路域植被盖度、景观质地、路域水体大小、路域植被种类、景观多样性、景观自然性、景观开阔性、景观完整性、景观生动性、天象特征和公路在视域内显著度呈显著相关关系;本文的评价模型中仅考虑路域植被类型与景观完整性两个自变量。依据评价结果,提出了五点有助于公路景观设计和决策的路域景观美学建设的建议。 Aesthetics perception of highway landscape is becoming one of the most important components of high quality transportation environment in China. On the basis of Psychophysical methods, the aesthetics quality of different elements of highway landscape is assessed from the attitude of highway user, the index system of assessing highway landscape aesthetics quality is provided and the model is built. The result indicates that highway landscape aesthetics quality is significant correlate with those indexes including characters of roadside artificial buildings, the distance between highway and artificial buildings, the harmony level between buildings and surroundings, the covering level of roadside vegetation, landscape texture, the amount of roadside water, the types of roadside vegetation, landscape diversity, landscape naturalness, the depth of view, the landscape intactness, landscape vividness, the characters of atmospheric phenomena and proportion of highway roadside vegetation and landscape intactness. highway landscape design and decision.
出处 《公路》 北大核心 2009年第3期162-167,共6页 Highway
基金 交通部西部交通建设科技项目 西部公路建设中生物资源保护技术研究 项目编号200731822010
关键词 风景美 视觉质量 公路景观 景观感知 公路使用者 路域 scenic beauty visual quality in view. The assessment model only consists of the types of Finally, five good advices are presented for benefiting the highway landscape landscape perception highway user roadside
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1王云 崔鹏 李海峰.公路景观美学评价差异研究.兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2005,41.
  • 2俞孔坚.自然景观空间意义之探索——南太行山典型峡谷景观韵律美评价[J].北京林业大学学报,1991,13(1):9-17. 被引量:9
  • 3Clay G R, Staid R K. Assessing the validity and reliability of descriptor variables used in scenic highway analysis[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004,66.
  • 4Clay Cary R, Terry C D. Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 49.
  • 5Robert B, Richard E C, Todd B. Group difference in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 47.
  • 6Akbar K F, Hale W H G, Headley A D. Assessment of scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,63.
  • 7Kent R I., Elliott C L. Scenic routes linking and protecting natural and cultural landscape features: a greenway skeleton [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995,33.
  • 8Meitner M J. Scenic beauty of river views in the Grand Canyon: relating perceptual judgments to locations [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004,68.
  • 9Office of Environmental Policy, U S. Department of Transportation. Visual Impact Assessment for Highway Projects[M]. Washington, D C, 1988.
  • 10Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Visual Resource Inventory [M]. Washington, D C,1986.

二级参考文献26

共引文献283

同被引文献69

引证文献9

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部