期刊文献+

血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂对心力衰竭患者的疗效

Effect of angiotensin-Ⅱ-receptor antagonists used in patients with chronic congestive heart failure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不能耐受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)的慢性充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者(NYHA分级Ⅲ~Ⅳ级,射血分数<40%)血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(ARB)治疗和长期规律随访的效果。方法:前瞻性长期随访23例不能耐受ACEI的CHF患者接受ARB治疗和31例应用ACEI治疗患者的疗效,并比较两组患者的临床资料和ARB组生存患者治疗5年前后的临床资料。结果:(1)ARB组与ACEI组5年死亡率无明显差别(52.17%∶48.39%,P>0.05);(2)ARB组中高龄、肌酐清除率(Ccr)降低的患者死亡率高(P<0.01);(3)ARB组中NYHA分级Ⅲ~Ⅳ级、射血分数<40%的患者大多死于心力衰竭恶化(75%),而猝死和明确死于室性心律失常的患者占死亡总数的25%;尽管规范地进行抗心力衰竭药物治疗,5年死亡率仍高达52.17%。长期接受ARB治疗的生存患者,其射血分数较治疗前明显增加[(32.5±1.6)%∶(44.5±3.2)%,P<0.01]、左心室舒张末期内径明显缩减[(66.3±2.0)%∶(60.2±2.9)%,P<0.05],NYHA分级显著改善(P<0.05)。结论:部分不能耐受ACEI的CHF患者可能从ARB长期治疗中获益。 Objective: To evaluate the effect of angiotensin- Ⅱ -receptor antagonists (ARB) in patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) who were intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI). Methods.. The 23 cases (NYHA Ⅲ-Ⅳ, ejection fraction〈40%) intolerant to ACEIs and given by ARBs had been regularity followed up for 5 years (ARB group). The CHF cases treated with ACEI were regard as control group. Clinical characteristics were compared between two groups. The data before and after five years in survival CHF patients of ARB group were also studied. Results: (1) The mortality of ARB group was not significantly different from that of ACEI group (52.17% : 48.39%, P〉0.05) ; (2) There were higher mortality in older patients and with lower creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) (P〈0. 01) in patients used ARBs; (3) The patients mostly died from deterioration of heart function (75 % ) and the five-year mortality was 52.2 % in ARB group. The LVEF and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd) of the survival CHF patients were better than those of five-year before in ARB group (P〈0.05-〈 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with CHF intolerant to ACEI would have a better prognosis if given ARB long-term.
出处 《心血管康复医学杂志》 CAS 2009年第2期146-149,161,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 心力衰竭 充血性 血管紧张素Ⅱ1型受体拮抗剂 血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂 死亡率 Heart failure, congestive Angiotensin-Ⅱ type 1 receptor antagonists Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors Mortality
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1慢性收缩性心力衰竭治疗建议[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30(1):7-23. 被引量:2414
  • 2Swedberg K, Cleland J, Dargie H, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005) : The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure of the European society of cardiology [J]. Eur Heart J. 2005, 26 (11): 1115-1140.
  • 3Dickstein K, Kjekshus J, OPTIMAAL Steering Committee of the OPTIMAAL Study Group. Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal trial in myocardial infarction with angiotensin Ⅱ antagonist losartan [J]. Lancet, 2002, 360 (9335): 752--60.
  • 4Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors:the CHARM Alternative trial[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362 (9386): 772--776.
  • 5Pfeffer MA, McMurrayJJ, Velazquez EJ, etal. Valsartan, cap topril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart fail ure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both [J]. N Engl J Med 2003, 349 (20): 1893--1906.
  • 6Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Segal R, et al. Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial the losartan heart failure survival studyELITE Ⅱ [J]. Lancet, 2000, 355 (9215): 1582-- 1587.
  • 7Flather MD, Yusuf S, Kober L, et al. Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic overview of data from individual patients [J]. Lancet, 2000, 355 (9215): 1575--1581.
  • 8殷兆芳,吴士尧.从循证医学到循证实践[J].循证医学,2007,7(1):31-32. 被引量:7

二级参考文献7

共引文献2419

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部