期刊文献+

数字化乳腺摄影的临床应用价值 被引量:14

The Clinical Value of Digital Mammography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨数字化乳腺摄影在临床工作中的应用价值。资料与方法按顺序抽取接受数字化乳腺摄影和传统屏片乳腺摄影检查的各500例患者的影像资料,就其图像病变显示率、摄片质量及照射剂量进行对比评价。结果(1)数字化乳腺摄影与传统屏片乳腺摄影对病变显示率的比较如下:微小钙化分别为26%和11.2%(P=0.000),肿块分别为15.2%和10.8%(P=0.039),结构扭曲分别为18%和8.8%(P=0.000),皮肤、乳头影改变分别为4.8%和1.8%(P=0.008)。两组差异有统计学意义。(2)照射剂量及重检率比较:数字化乳腺摄影照射剂量较传统屏片乳腺摄影减少,因设备因素引起的重检率为0;传统屏片乳腺摄影因设备因素引起的重检率为1.4%。结论数字化乳腺摄影检查技术及图像的病变显示率均优于传统屏片乳腺摄影。数字化乳腺摄影系统操作简便、成像快捷、辐射较低,具有较高的临床应用价值。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of digital mammography. Materials and Methods We collected 500 images of digital mammography and screen-film mammography respectively. Display of diseases, quality of images and radiation doses were compared. Results ( 1 ) Digital mammography with traditional screen-film mammography of the disease showed that rates were as follows : microcalcification 26% vsl 1.2% , P = 0. 000, mass 15.2% vsl0.8% , P = 0. 039, architectural distortion 18% vs8.8% , P = 0. 000, skin and nipple changes affect 4.8% vsl. 8%, P = 0. 008. There was a significant difference between the two groups. (2) Radiation doses and ratio of repeat radiation: radiation doses of digital mammography were reduced, the ratio of repeat digital vaammography was zero. The ratio of repeat traditional film-screen mammography was 1.4%. Conclusion Digital mammography is superior to traditional screen-film mammography in technology and quality of diagnostic image, digital mammography has a higher clinical application value and should be used widely,
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期494-497,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 数字化 X线摄影 乳腺 屏片 Digital Mammography Breast Screen-film
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imanging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th de Reston: Am College Radiol, 2003,1.
  • 2杨文洁,陈克敏.数字化乳腺X线成像系统技术进展[J].诊断学理论与实践,2004,3(1):49-51. 被引量:6
  • 3Gaspard-Bakhach S, Dihuydy MH, Bonichon F, et al. ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography. Radiol,2000,81 : 133.
  • 4Venta LA, Hendrick RE, Adler YT,et al. Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. A JR,2001,176: 1241.
  • 5Free TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection:prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology,2001,220:781.

二级参考文献16

  • 1[1]Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM,et al. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis[J].JAMA, 1995,273(2): 149-154.
  • 2[2]TAbar L, Vitak B, Tony HH, et al. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality [J].Cancer, 2001,91 (9): 1724-1731.
  • 3[3]Gram IT, Funkhouser E,Tabar L. The Tabar classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns[J]. Eur J Radiol ,1997,24(2): 131-136.
  • 4[4]Pisano ED. Current status of full-field digital mammography [J]. Radiology, 2000, 214(1):26-28.
  • 5[5]Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR. Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice[J]. Med Phys, 2002, 29(5):830-834.
  • 6[6]Yorker JG, Jeromin LS, Lee DLY, et al. Characterization of a full field digital mammography detector based on direct X-ray conversion in selenium [J]. SPIE, 2002, 4682:21-29.
  • 7[7]Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, et al. Fullbreast digital mammography with an amorphous siliconbased flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Med Phys,2000,27(3):558-567.
  • 8[8]Chan HP, Helvie MA, Petrick N, et al. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications [J]. Acad Radiol, 2001,8(6):454-466.
  • 9[9]Gaspard-Bakhach S, Dihuydy MH,Bonichon F, et al. ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography [J].J Radiol, 2000,81(2):133-139.
  • 10[10]Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, et al. Magnification mammography:A comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications [J]. Eur Radiol, 2002,12(9):2188-2191.

共引文献5

同被引文献89

引证文献14

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部