期刊文献+

子宫腺肌症MRI、超声及血清肿瘤标志物诊断分析与评价 被引量:5

Evaluation and Analysis of MRI,Sonography and Tumor Markers of Serum in the Diagnosis of Uterine Adenomyosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价MRI、超声及血清肿瘤标志物对子宫腺肌症的诊断价值。资料与方法对病理证实的45例子宫腺肌症与36例子宫肌瘤患者术前行超声(经腹、经阴道)、MRI及血清CA125、CA153、CA199测定。分析各项检查诊断子宫腺肌症的敏感性、特异性及准确性。结果MRI诊断子宫腺肌症的敏感性为95.56%,特异性为100%,准确性为97.53%;经阴道超声为80.0%、88.89%、83.95%;经腹部超声为68.89%、83.33%、75.31%;血清CA125为46.67%、88.89%、65.43%;CA153为33.33%、94.44%、60.49%;CA199为15.56%、97.22%、51.85%。MRI、经阴道超声、经腹超声、血清CA125、CA153、CA199诊断子宫腺肌症的敏感性(χ2=83.213,P<0.01)、准确性(χ2=56.216,P<0.01)有非常显著统计学意义,特异性(χ2=9.513,P>0.05)无统计学意义。结论对于子宫腺肌症的诊断,MRI、超声及血清肿瘤标志物均有一定价值,MRI、超声检查优于血清肿瘤标志物(CA125、CA153、CA199)指标,MRI是最有价值的检查手段。 Objective To investigate the role of MRI, sonography and tumor markers of serum in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Materials and Methods MRI, sonography (transabdominal and transvaginal sonography )and estimation of serum CA125, CA199 and CA153 levels were carried out in 45 patients confirmed pathologically as uterine adenomyosis and 36 patents with leiomyoma before operation. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were analyzed respectively. Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MR in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis were 95.56% , 100% and 97.53%, those of TVS were 80.0% ,88.89% and 83.95% , those of TAS were 68.89% ,83.33% and 75.31% , those of serum CA125 levels were 46.67% ,88.89% and 65.43% , those of serum CA153 levels were 33.33% ,94.44% and 60.49% , those of serum of CA199 levels were 15.56% ,97.22% and 51.85%. The difference was much significant on sensitivity and accuracy in diagnosing the uterine adenomyosis and not significant on specificity. Conclusion MRI, sonography and tumor markers of serum are helpful to diagnose the uterine adenomyosis. However, MRI, transvaginal and transabdominal sonography are superior to CA125,CA199 and CA153 of serum, MRI is the best modality of them.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期531-534,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 子宫腺肌症 磁共振成像 超声 肿瘤标志物 Adenomyosis Magnetic resonance imaging Sonography Tumor markers
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Kido A,Togashi K, Koyama T, et al. Diffusely enlarged uterus : evaluation with MR imaging. RadioGraphics ,2003,23 : 1423.
  • 2Nascimento AF, Hirsch MS, Cviko A, et al. The role of CD10 staining in distinguishing invasive endometrial adenocarcinoma from adeno- carcinoma involving adenomyosis. Mod Pathol,2003 ,16 :22.
  • 3王军燕,李亚里,汪龙霞,赵昀,张晶,申明识,梁力,张书梅.超声成像与CD10表达诊断卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2005,13(2):81-84. 被引量:3
  • 4Hsieh YY, Lin CS. P53 codon 11,72, and 248 gene polymorphisms in endometriosis. Int J Biol Sei ,2006,2:188.
  • 5Bhanoori M, Babu KA, Reddy P, et al. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) + 405G > C 5 '-untranslated region polymor- phism and increased risk of endometriosis in South Indian wgmen:a case control study. Human Reproduction, 2005,21) : 1844.
  • 6Laschke MW, Elitzsch A, Vollmar B, et al. Combined inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor( VEGF), fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor,but not inhibition of VEGF alone effectively suppresses angiogenesis and vessel maturation in endom- etriotic lesions. Human Reproduciton,2006,21:262.
  • 7Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, et al. Deep Pelvic Endometriosis : MR Imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology ,2004,232:379.
  • 8Frate CD, Girometti R, Pittino M, et al. Deep retroperitoneal pelvic endometriosis : MR imaging appearance with laparoscopic correlation. RadioGraphics ,2006,26 : 1705.
  • 9Abrao MS, Goncalves MODC, Jr JAD, et al. Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Human Reproduction, 2007,22 : 3092.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Hisanobu M,Tsuyoshi S,Koji A,et al. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases in ovarian endometriomas: immunohistochemical study and enzyme immunoassay. Life Sciences ,2002,71(3): 259.
  • 2Chu PG,Arber DA,Weiss LM,et al. Utility of CD10 in distinguishing between endometrial stromal sarcoma and uterine smooth muscle tumors: an immunohistochemical comparison of 34 casea. Mod Pathol,2001,14(5): 465.
  • 3Suren,A, Osmers,R, Dietrich,M, et al. Sonomorphology of endometriotic cysts.Int-J-Gynaecol-Obstet,1998,62(2):155.
  • 4[美]JUANROSAI 回允中主译.阿克曼外科病理学:第8 版下卷[M].沈阳: 辽宁教育出版社,1999.1471.
  • 5王军燕.妇科[A].唐杰董宝玮主编.腹部和外周血管彩色多普勒诊断学: 第2 版[C].北京: 人民卫生出版社,1999.249.
  • 6曲玉清,王丽,朱慧庭,周先荣,杜心谷.卵巢子宫内膜异位症恶变26例临床病理分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2001,36(8):470-472. 被引量:17
  • 7郎景和.子宫内膜异位症的研究与设想[J].中华妇产科杂志,2003,38(8):478-480. 被引量:529
  • 8王军燕,汪龙霞,童新元,张晶,王东,冉淑芬.超声在盆腔炎性肿块与卵巢肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用[J].中国超声医学杂志,2003,19(7):547-549. 被引量:21

共引文献2

同被引文献27

  • 1武庆利,谢继明.子宫腺肌症的低场MRI表现[J].医学影像学杂志,2010,20(12):1856-1859. 被引量:6
  • 2徐忠飞,郑建萍,钟吉俊,吴玉林,张燕,胡明华.子宫腺肌症的MRI表现及诊断价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2012,22(2):314-315. 被引量:9
  • 3彭超,周应芳,廖秦平.子宫腺肌病患者痛经强度与前列腺素的相关性研究[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(1):26-29. 被引量:34
  • 4刘秋慧.血清CA125测定在子宫腺肌病中的诊断价值[J].北京医学,2007,29(5):268-268. 被引量:1
  • 5Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Haacke EM, et al. Clinical ap- plications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted ima- ging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2005, 22(4) :439.
  • 6Hottat N, Larrousse C, Anaf V, et al. Endometriosis : contri- bution of 3.0 T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assess- ment-initial results [ J ]. Radiology, 2009,253 ( 1 ) : 126.
  • 7Lone FW, Balogun M, Khan KS. Adenomyosis: not such an elusive diagnosis any longer [ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2006,26 ( 3 ) :225.
  • 8Kitamura Y, Allison S J, Jha RC, et al. MRI of adenomyosis : changes with uterine artery embolization [ J ]. A JR, 2006, 186(3) :855.
  • 9Schmidt C. CA-125:a biomarker put to the test[J].{H}JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE,2011,(103):1290-1291.
  • 10Socolov R,Butureanu S,Angioni S. The value of serological markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of endometriosis:a prospectine case-control study[J].{H}European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology,2011,(154):215-217.

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部