摘要
目的:探讨阿立哌唑与氯氮平治疗精神分裂症的疗效和不良反应的差异。方法:应用Meta分析对13项阿立哌唑与氯氮平治疗精神分裂症对照研究的文章进行再分析,评价其合并效应量大小和综合显著性检验。结果:阿立哌唑自身对照比较的治疗效应极大,合并效应量d=-3.81,95%CI(-7.43,-0.19),χ2=156.13,P<0.01;阿立哌唑与氯氮平在治疗2周末和治疗后组间的比较疗效差异无显著性,差异效应偏小,分别为Y合并=0.02,95%CI(-012,0.15),χ2=0.20,P>0.05;Y合并=-0.003,95%CI(-0.13,0.13),χ2=2.04,P>0.05;阿立哌唑的不良反应显著少于氯氮平。结论:阿立哌唑与氯氮平的疗效相仿,但阿立哌唑不良反应少。
Objective: To explore the differences of efficacy and side effects between aripiprazol and clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia. Method: 13 comparative studies of aripiprazol and clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia were analyzed by meta-analysis in efficacy and side effects. Results: Self-controlled studies showed therapeutic effect of aripiprazol was great, d = - 3.81,95 % CI( - 7.43, - 0.19 ), x2 = 156.13, P 〈 0.01. No significant difference was found between aripiprazol and clozapine after 2 weeks and throughout the treatment, the efficacy difference was not significant. Y = - 0.02,95% CI( - 0.12,0. 15 ), X2 = 0.20, P 〉 0.05 ; Yco = - 0.003,95% CI( -0. 13,0.13 ), x2 = 2.04, P 〉 0.05. Side effects were slighter in aripiprazol group than in clozapine group. Conclusion: Therapeutic effects of aripiprazol and clozapine for schizophrenia are similar, but aripiprazol shows fewer side effects.
出处
《临床精神医学杂志》
2009年第2期90-93,共4页
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry