期刊文献+

论高校与学生行政纠纷的司法解决 被引量:5

On the Judicial Resolution to the Administrative Disputes between Universities and Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高校与学生间的行政纠纷通过诉讼渠道得以化解,有赖于一套成熟、可行的司法审查机制的确立。在司法审查介入的范围上,应定位于高校行使公权力对学生宪法权益造成或足以造成重大损害或者改变或足以改变学生身份的事项;在介入时机方面,坚持行政救济优先但又不拘泥、僵化于行政救济的前置程序,对专业性较低的非学术性纠纷司法可以直接介入;在司法审查展开环节,以比例原则、利益衡量原则作为指导;在审查强度上,确立以法律审查和程序审查为主,以事实审查和实体审查为辅的综合标准,同时对校规进行附带性审查;考虑到纠纷的特殊性,对此类行政纠纷的裁判形式的选择,应立足于维护权利人的合法权益,同时也要关照大学自治的空间。 That the Administrative Disputes between colleges and students would be resolved by litigation channels depends on a series of mature and feasible judicial review mechanism to be established. In the scope of judicial review intervention, the issues that colleges and universities exercising public authority bring about serious damage on the constitutional rights of students or change the identity of the students should be orientated. On the occasion of intervention, the priority of administrative relief should he in- sisted on, but pre--procedure should not he rigidly adhered to, and judicature shall be intervened directly in the non--academic disputes with lower profession. In the segment of judicial review, the principle of review such as proportion and interest measurement shall be stuck to. In the intensity of the review , the comprehensive standard that the reviews on statute and procedure are given first place and on facts and entities are supplemented shall be established and subsidiary review on regulations shall be carried out at the same time. Considering the special nature of the dispute, the choice formed by the judgement on such administrative disputes should be based on safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the very person and reflectingt the self--governing space in the universities at the same time.
作者 李永林
机构地区 内蒙古科技大学
出处 《西部法学评论》 2009年第2期73-83,共11页 Western Law Review
基金 2006年度内蒙古社科规划项目<高等学校行政纠纷司法审查机制研究>(06C034)
关键词 高校 学生 行政纠纷 司法解决 Universities and Colleges Students Administrative Disputes Judicial Resolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1周佑勇.行政法的正当程序原则[J].中国社会科学,2004(4):115-124. 被引量:240
  • 2胡肖华,徐靖.高校校规的违宪审查问题[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2005,23(2):20-26. 被引量:55
  • 3[5]胡剑森.论公法原则[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2005.
  • 4[6]吴庚.行为法之理论与实用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
  • 5See ACADEMIC FREEDOM 2,ed. By John Daniel, Frederiek de Vlaming, Nigel Hartley, Manfred Nowak, (London: Zed Books, 1993), pp1.
  • 6侯毅君.偷尝禁果引来麻烦——女大学生因怀孕被通报开除,欲告学校侵犯隐私[N].北京青年报,2002—11—20.
  • 7[英]沃克.牛津法律大辞典(中译本)[Z].北京:光明日报出版社,1988..
  • 8[法]孟德斯鸠 张雁深.论法的精神(上册)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987..
  • 9赵西巨.学生宪法权利与学校自由裁量权[J].山东省青年管理干部学院学报,2001,(2).
  • 10陈新民.大学自治与法律保留何者为重[OL].http://www.npf.org.tw,.

共引文献72

同被引文献30

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部