期刊文献+

东亚民主化比较研究:以台湾地区和韩国为例 被引量:2

Riding on"Third Wave":Comparative Study of Democratization in Taiwan and South Korea
下载PDF
导出
摘要 台韩都是在现代化发展到一定程度之后,在某些外部条件和特殊条件推动之下启动民主化的;在民主化进程中,都必须处理威权遗留问题,都出现了某个最棘手的"情境问题"("台独"问题;财阀问题);民主化的最终目标都是建立并巩固自由民主政体.台韩民主化也存在着不同:台湾民主化属于"变革"型,韩国民主化属于"移转"型;韩国民主化的基本任务是落实"第六共和国宪法",巩固民主宪政,台湾民主化由于背负了所谓"台湾独立"的额外负担,民主巩固的任务极其艰巨.总之,台韩民主化进程说明:建立民主体制容易,坚守和巩固民主难.台韩要从"选举民主"政体发展到自由民主政体,培育出"羽翼丰满的民主制度",还需要有文化、社会和政治的巨变. To some extent of development to modernization, Taiwan and South Korea, propelled by some external conditions and special internal conditions, started the process of democratization. During the process, they managed to solve the problems handed down by the authoritarian regimes, and the most knotty "contextual problems" such as the issue of "Taiwan Independence" and chaebol issue. Furthermore, the final goal is the same, that is, to establish and consolidate liberal democracy. However, there exist great differences between them: first, they belong to different democratization models. Taiwan is classified as the category of "transformation" model while South Korea, the category of" transplantation" model; second, they have different futures. The basic mission of South Korea is to implement "the Sixth Republic's Constitution" and consolidate democratic constitutional governments, but for Taiwan, because of the extra burden of so-called" Taiwan Independence", it is rather difficult to consolidate its democracy. Generally speaking, consolidating democracy is much more difficult than establishing democratic institutions, as evidenced by the democratization of Taiwan and South Korea. To develop sophisticated democracy, or upgrade the electoral democracy to the liberal democracy, Taiwan and South Korea must undertake tremendous changes in culture, society and politics.
作者 林震
出处 《东莞理工学院学报》 2009年第2期11-15,共5页 Journal of Dongguan University of Technology
基金 福建省科技厅青年人才项目课题<海峡两岸公共管理模式比较研究>(编号:2008F3091)阶段性成果之一.
关键词 中国台湾 韩国 民主化比较 Chinese Taiwan South Korea comparison of democratizations
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1隅谷三幸男,等.台湾经济发展的成就与问题--新兴工业化经济群体的典例分析[M].汪慕恒,陈大冰,译.厦门:厦门大学出版社,1996:359.
  • 2Wonmo Dong.The Democratization of South Korea: What Role Does the Middle Class Play[J]. Korea Observer, 1991, XXII(2):259.
  • 3塞缪尔·亨廷顿.第三波——20世纪后期民主化浪潮[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998.
  • 4霍华德·威亚尔达,民主与民主化比较研究[M].榕远,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
  • 5Hooshang Amirahmadi.Development Paradigms at a Crossroad and the South Korean Experience[J].Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1989, 19(2):182.
  • 6Juan J. Linz.The Perils of Presidentialism, Journal of Democracy[J]. 1990,Winter:51-69.
  • 7Lisa Anderson.Transitions to Democracy[M].New York: Columbia University Press, 1999:26.
  • 8James Cotton, Korea Under Roh Tae-woo:Democratisation, Northen Policy, and Inter-Korea Relations, St Leonards: Allen & Unwin Pry Ltd. (Australia) , 1993, 317-321.
  • 9Joseph Wong,Dynamic Democratization in Taiwan, Journal of Contemporary China, 10(27),2001:339-362.
  • 10若林正丈. 《蒋经国与李登辉》,远流出版公司,台北,1998:154.

共引文献19

同被引文献21

  • 1姚建宗.国外政治发展研究述评[J].政治学研究,1999(4):78-89. 被引量:25
  • 2林震.试论台湾民主化的动因[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,7(2):54-59. 被引量:3
  • 3加布里埃尔·A.阿尔蒙德,小G·宾厄姆·鲍威尔.比较政治学--体系、过程和政策[M].曹沛霖,郑世平,公婷,陈蜂,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987:87.
  • 4胡锦涛在庆祝中国共产党成立90周年大会上的讲话[EB/OL].http://www.sina.com.cn2011-07-02.
  • 5亨廷顿.第三波-20世纪后期民主化浪潮[M].刘军宁,译.上海:三联书店,1998.
  • 6刘国深.试论两岸关系与台湾政治发展的辩证互动[EB/OL].http://www.shehuikxzl.cn/n/P2JPathQikan.
  • 7辛向阳.中国特色社会主义政治发展道路的科学定位[M]//北京市中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心.纪念改革开放30年论文集.2009:279.
  • 8坚持走中国特色政治发展道路绝不照搬别国政治制度的模式[EB/OL].(2005-01-25).http://news.sina.tom.cn/c/2005-01-25,09234938782s.shtml.
  • 9绿营政客挑动民粹[N].文汇报,2014-03-20.
  • 10黄嘉树,程瑞.台湾政治与选举文化[M].台北:博扬文化事业有限公司.2001.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部