摘要
从判定标准的尺度、范畴两方面对生态公益林与高保护价值森林进行比较,分析得出:两者都服务于森林可持续发展,但前者的判定标准从国家层面上制定,属于宏观尺度,后者的判定标准从森林经营单位层面上制定,属于微观尺度;范畴上,两者具有交叉性,两者都涵盖对方的部分森林类型,但不是全部森林类型。将生态公益林与高保护价值森林加以区别,将有利于社会公众及林业工作者更好地认识高保护价值森林,为高保护价值森林类型的判定提供借鉴。
The paper compared high conservation value forest with non-commercial forest on standard dimension and category, and the results were: they both survived for forest sustainable development. The standard dimension of the former which based on national level was macro-scale, and the latter based on forest management unit was micro-scale. On the category, both were interactive. They both concerned partial forest types, but not all. The distinction of high conservation value forest and non-commercial forest would be helpful for the public and forestry researchers to enlarge knowledge about high conservation value forest, and provide references for the judgment of high conservation value forest.
出处
《林业经济问题》
北大核心
2009年第1期65-69,共5页
Issues of Forestry Economics
关键词
高保护价值森林
生态公益林
森林可持续发展
high conservation value forest
non-commercial forest
forest sustainable development