期刊文献+

超学科视域中的教育关怀——基于一例学生行为规范话语实践的话语批判

Educational Solicitude in Tran-disciplinary Vision——A Discourse Analysis of the Discursive Practice of Behavioral Norms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在批判话语学视域中,教育场域各种行为规范的话语实践隐蕴着规定与描写、信息与互动、形塑与改塑、理性与论证等特征性话语意涵。对行为规范的话语实践展开话语间性、话语次序、话语混杂等方面的超学科话语分析,凸显了现代教育中由于技治理性和管理理性的超常张扬而映现的"话语技术化"、"话语商品化"而展现出理性与生活的张力,也揭示了现代文明进程中科学世界通过"语境重置"对生活世界的"殖民化"以及人的"物化"危机。同时,对行为规范的话语实践进行批判性话语研究,能够鲜活地使我们对事物获取一种现象学意义上的原初、自明、本质、冥会于心的观察、理解与诠释。 The discursive practice of Behavioral Norms in the educational field embodies such discourse connotations as being descriptive & prescriptive, informational & interact ional, diachronic & synchronic, rational & argumentation. A Tran disciplinary analysis of the discursive practice of Student Behavioral Norms, in the way of interdiscursivity, order of discourse & heteroglossia, can reveal the technologization & COM modification of diseourse in modem education, which are caused by the over inflation of technical rationality and managerial rationality', and it can also uncover the colonization of life world by science world through reeontextualization and the crisis of human reification. Meanwhile, a critical study on the discursive practice of Student Behavioral Nomrs, in a phenomenological sense, can vividly enable us to gain an origin, self- evident, intrinsic and introspective understanding and interpretation of things.
作者 胡云飞
出处 《教育与教学研究》 2009年第4期28-32,共5页 Education and Teaching Research
基金 浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(06CGYY19YBX)
关键词 行为规范 话语实践 技治理性 生活世界 话语批判 discursive practice instrumental rationality life world reificafion discourse analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Foucault M.The Archaeology of Knowledge[M].New York:Pantheon Books,1972.
  • 2Fairclough N.Discourse and Social Change[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1992.
  • 3Bakhtin M.Speech Genres and Other Late Essays[M].Austin:University of Texas Press,1986.
  • 4Kristeva W.The Kristeva Reader[M].Oxford:Blackwell Publisher Ltd,1986.
  • 5吴宗杰.论证中的话语混杂:外语测试的社会分析[J].外国语,2004,27(5):48-55. 被引量:22
  • 6Chouliaraki F.Disocourse in Late Modernity[M].Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press,1999.
  • 7Habermas J.Theory of Communicative Action[M].London:Heinemann,1987.
  • 8Fairclough N.Language and Power[M].London:Longman,1989.
  • 9Tannen D.Talking Voices:Repetition,Dialogue,and Imagery in Conversational Discourse[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1989.
  • 10Fairclough N.The Dialectics of Discourse[EB/OL].http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/sta ff/norman/2001a.doc.

二级参考文献54

  • 1高玉.语言本质“道器”论[J].四川外语学院学报,2001,17(2):56-59. 被引量:10
  • 2Chouliaraki, L & N Fairclough. Discourse in Late Modernity [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
  • 3Andrews, R. Teaching and Learning Argument [M]. London: Cassell, 1995.
  • 4Habermas, J. Theory of Communicative Action vol.1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society[M]. London: Heinemann, 1986.
  • 5Toulmin, S E, Rieke, R & A Janik. An Introduction to Reasoning [M]. New York:Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc, 1979.
  • 6Bakhtin, M. The Dialogic Imagination [M]. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
  • 7Austin, J L. How to Do Things with Words [M].Oxford. OUP, 1962.
  • 8Foucault, M. The Foucault Reader [C]. P Rabinow (ed). London: Penguin, 1984.
  • 9Bhaskar, R. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation [M]. London: Verso, 1986.
  • 10Martin, J R. Grammar Meets Genre: Reflections on the 'Sydney School' Inaugural Lecture [Z]. Sydney University Arts Association, 2000.

共引文献244

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部