颈动脉狭窄程度的超声评估
摘要
颈动脉狭窄是缺血性脑血管病重要的致病因素之一.随着颈动脉狭窄程度的加重,缺血性脑卒中的发生率也增加.超声多普勒血流显像检测颈动脉因其安全、高敏感度和高特异度.目前被认为是最有效的检查方法之一。彩色多普勒血流显像(CDFI)的检测,不应单纯检测出颈动脉硬化斑块存在,更重要的是评估颈动脉狭窄的程度,为临床治疗提供可靠的依据。
出处
《现代医药卫生》
2009年第9期1398-1399,共2页
Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
参考文献2
-
1Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL,et al.Carotid artery stenosis:grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis-society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference[J].Ultrasound Q, 2003,19 : 190.
-
2华扬,刘蓓蓓,凌晨,段春,刘强,缪中荣,李慎茂,凌锋.超声检查对颈动脉狭窄50%~69%和70%~99%诊断准确性的评估[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2006,3(5):211-218. 被引量:118
二级参考文献17
-
1[1]North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.N Engl J Med,1991,325:445-453.
-
2[2]European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial:interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis.Lancet,1991,337:1235-1243.
-
3[3]Carpenter JP,Lexa FJ,Davis JT,et al.Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid artery stenosis by duplex Doppler ultrasonography.J Vasc Surg,1995,22:697-705.
-
4[4]Moneta GL,Edwards JM,Chitwood RW,et al.Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid arte ry stenosis with duplex scanning.J Vasc Surg,1993,17:152-159.
-
5[5]Huston J 3rd,James EM,Brown RD Jr,et al.Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.Mayo Clin Proc,2000,75:1133-1140.
-
6[6]AbuRahma AF,Robinson PA,Strickler DL,et al.Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials.Ann Vasc Surg,1998,12:349-358.
-
7[8]Suwanwela N,Can U,Furie KL,et al.Carotid Doppler ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery stenosis based on residual lumen diameter calculated from en bloc carotid endarterectomy specimens.Stroke,1996,27:1965-1969.
-
8[9]Grant EG,Benson CB,Moneta GL,et al.Carotid artery stenosis:grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis-Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference.Ultrasound Q,2003,19:190-198.
-
9[10]Carpenter JP,Lexa FJ,Davis JT.Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.Stroke,1996,27:695-699.
-
10[11]Hunink MG,Polak JF,Barlan MM,et al.Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis:efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters.AJR Am J Roentgenol,1993,160:619-625.
共引文献117
-
1韩冰,华扬,凌晨,段春,刘强,张蕾.颈内动脉中重度狭窄或闭塞患者同侧颈总动脉血流动力学的观察[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2008,5(12):536-540. 被引量:12
-
2赵新宇,华扬,贾凌云.彩色多普勒血流显像评价不同类型颈内动脉闭塞患者血管结构与血流动力学变化[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(12):2493-2501. 被引量:17
-
3单晓宇,刘敬霞,楚国庆,张惠.回药扎里奴思方对脑梗死患者颈动脉硬化的影响[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2012,34(8):753-756. 被引量:17
-
4赵志宏,隋秀芳,章生龙.彩色多普勒超声对2型糖尿病颈动脉病变的诊断价值[J].中国临床保健杂志,2013,16(6):626-627. 被引量:6
-
5华扬.颈动脉粥样硬化性缺血性脑血管病的超声检测与应用[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志,2006,6(5):346-352. 被引量:26
-
6周立春,贾伟华,邱传亚.三种影像学检查对颈动脉狭窄的诊断价值[J].临床荟萃,2007,22(5):312-314. 被引量:10
-
7孟秀峰,华扬,凌晨,段春,刘强.超声检测分析椎动脉走行变异与眩晕发作的关系[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2007,4(10):458-462. 被引量:15
-
8张春梅,吴长君,郑森,邱前义,曲松滨,解洪荣,陈桂英,李国霖.无症状颈动脉狭窄患者脑血管栓子信号的超声研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2008,17(2):112-116. 被引量:5
-
9黄伟俊,熊建群.超声在脑梗死患者颈动脉系统的研究进展[J].临床超声医学杂志,2008,10(5):325-327. 被引量:8
-
10李军,刘刚,彭小祥.颈内动脉颅外段狭窄超声检测参数的判别分析和主成分分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2008,5(6):246-250. 被引量:2
-
1潘颖,龚伟,胡仁明,钟绍,曹雪明.颈动脉内膜中层厚度测定在糖尿病视网膜病变中的应用[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2008,16(6):584-585. 被引量:7
-
2张士杰,田坚.糖尿病伴缺血性脑血管疾病患者胰岛素水平的测定[J].沈阳医学院学报,2000,2(2):71-71.
-
3王艳秋,李文革.探讨经颅多普勒对缺血性脑血管疾病诊断的临床意义[J].中外医疗,2008,27(13):59-60.
-
4李印肖.颈动脉粥样硬化与缺血性脑血管病的关系研究[J].中国医药导刊,2008,10(5):662-662. 被引量:2
-
5田玉峰.缺血性脑血管病患者血清瘦素水平分析[J].放射免疫学杂志,2004,17(5):375-376.
-
6王欢,杨敏,尹凤媛,刘青梅,王丽华,田巧云,陈立杰.脂必妥治疗高脂血症的疗效观察[J].黑龙江医学,1996,0(3):33-34.
-
7谢晓娟.通心络胶囊治疗高脂血症临床观察[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2009,11(2):57-57. 被引量:1
-
8李鸿彬.阿司匹林对急性缺血性脑血管疾病患者胃黏膜损伤的临床研究[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2009,11(1):48-48.
-
9曹树军,张建维,马莉,张银,韩兰唐,王立忠,王金波,俞晓薇,胡硕强,王文斌.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的严重程度对冠心病患者预后的影响的临床研究[J].中国医药导报,2012,9(16):40-41. 被引量:5
-
10李琳,李兴国,刘中国,边晓菊,刘品.老年高血压患者颈动脉病变特点及颈动脉硬化与缺血性脑血管病发生的关系[J].现代医药卫生,2010,26(13):1931-1932. 被引量:1