摘要
大陆法系与英美法系财产支配权之内容差异明显:前者之完全支配权(所有权)概念围绕如何区别于他物权而进行,强调物之归属,而后者乃以对物之利用为中心的相对所有权;前者之使用价值支配权(用益物权)以所有权为中心而构建,实为所有权所派生之权利,而后者并无前者之用益物权概念和体系;前者之交换价值支配权(担保物权)围绕担保债之实现为中心展开,然价值取向却有强调担保物权附随性与独立性之分歧,而后者则强调其用益与担保之功能。
The Continental Law System and the Anglo-American Law System are quite distinctive on the right of property ownership： the former stresses how to differ from other property, while the latter stresses the relative ownership from the right of use; the former stresses the use value, which is closely attached to property ownership, while the latter has no such connotation; the former stresses the real rights granted by way of security, while the latter stresses the function of use and security.
