期刊文献+

替罗非班治疗ST段抬高急性心肌梗死冠状动脉再通患者的临床特征及预后分析 被引量:1

Prognosis of acute myocardial infarction patients with infarct - related artery patency after tirofiban application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析血小板GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗药替罗非班治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)梗死相关血管自发性再通患者的临床特征及住院期和远期预后。方法152例AMI患者口服阿司匹林、氯吡格雷基础上加用替罗非班,急诊血管造影显示,前向血流TIMI2—3级为自发再通组(75例),TIM10~1级经冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后前向血流TIMI2—3级为PCI再通组(74例),3例因未达到TIMI2—3级剔除本研究。比较两组的临床特征及住院期和远期预后。结果两组临床特征比较差异无统计学意义。与PCI再通组比较,自发再通组术后30、180d主要不良心脏事件(MACE)(包括死亡、再梗死和再次靶血管重建)显著减少(P〈0.05),左室射血分数(LVEF)显著增加(P〈0.05)。多因素回归分析显示,梗死前心绞痛(OR=0.36,P=0.03)、胸痛时间〈6h(OR=0.56,P〈0.05)是梗死相关血管白发性再通的独立决定因素。结论应用GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗药替罗非班治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的梗死相关血管自发性再通患者预后较好。 Objective To retrospectively analyze the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction patients with infarct - related artery patency after tirofiban application. Methods 152 patients with ST - elevated acute myocardial infarction who received intravenous tirofiban application after emergency coronary angiography or PCI for the patients with forward blood flow TIMI 0 - 1. The patients with forward blood flow TIMI 2 - 3 at the initial angiography were classified as group 1( n = 75 ) and those with TIMI 2 - 3 after successful PCI as group 2 ( n = 74). 3 cases failed to reach TIMI 2 - 3 were excluded from this study. Clinical characteristics, in -hospital and longterm prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results There was no difference in clinical characteristics between the two groups apart from more patients with pre - AMI angina ( OR = 0. 36, P = 0. 03 ) and the onset of chest pain within 6 hours ( OR =0. 56 . P 〈 0. 05 ) in group 1 . Compared with the patients in group 2, the patients in group 1 had increased LVEF ( P 〈 0.05 ) and less major adverse cardiac events ( including cardiac death, re - infarction and target vessle revascularization ) at 30 days and 180 days after the operation ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion After the application of tirofiban in the patients with ST - segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, the infarct - related artery spontaneous patency have better prognosis than those via PCI.
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期312-315,共4页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
关键词 替罗非班 急性心肌梗死 再灌注 临床特征 预后 Timfiban Acute myocardial infarction Infarct - related artery Patency Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献78

  • 1沈杰,沈卫峰.替罗非班在急性冠脉综合征介入治疗中的应用[J].国际心血管病杂志,2006,33(3):156-159. 被引量:72
  • 2[1]Elmouchi DA,Bates ER.Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitor therapy in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes[J].Minerva Cardioangiol,2003,51 (5):547-560.
  • 3[2]Valgimigli M,Percoco G,Malagutti P,et al.Tirofiban and sirolimus-eluting stent vs abciximab and bare-metal stent for acute myocardial infarction:a randomized trial[J].JAMA,2005,293 (17):2109-2117.
  • 4[3]Heitzer,T Ollmann,I Koke,K et al.Platelet Glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa Receptor Blockade Improves Vascular Nitric Oxide Bioavailability in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease[J].Circulation,2003,108 (5):536-541.
  • 5[4]Warnholtz A,Ostad MA,Heitzer T,et al.Effect of tirofiban on percutaneous coronary intervention-induced endothelial dysfunction in patients with stable coronary artery disease[J].Am J Cardiol,2005,95 (1):20-23
  • 6[5]De Luca G,Smit JJ,Ernst N,et al.Impact of adjunctive tirofiban administration on myocardial perfusion and mortality in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J].Thromb Haemost,2005,93 (5):820-823.
  • 7[6]Martinez-Rios MA,Rosas M,Gonzalez H,et al.Comparison of reperfusion regimens with or without tirofiban in STelevation acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,2004,93 (3):280-287.
  • 8[7]Lavi S,Gruberg L,Kapeliovich M,et al.The impact of GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitors during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction patients[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2005,17 (6):296-299.
  • 9[8]Roffi M,Chew DP,Mukherjee D,et al.Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibition in acute coronary syndromes.Gradient of benefit related to the revascularization strategy[J].Eur Heart J,2002,23 (18):1441-1448.
  • 10[9]Sabatine MS,Morrow DA,Giugliano RP,et al.Implications of upstream glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibition and coronary artery stenting in the invasive management of unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction:a comparison of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) ⅢB trial and the Treat angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-TIMI 18 trial[J].Circulation,2004,109 (7):874-880.

共引文献192

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部