期刊文献+

投资者结构与股价波动:基于过度自信和注意力分配的理论分析 被引量:13

Investor Structure and Stock Price Volatility:Theoretical Analysis Based on Overconfidence and Attention Allocation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文假定市场上仅存在散户和机构,且他们之间存在过度自信的差异和对多期私有信息注意力分配方式的差异,在此基础上对投资者结构和股价波动的关系进行了理论分析,并进一步研究了投资者结构的长期均衡问题。研究表明,当两种差异同时存在时,第一,市场上现有的投资者结构决定了散户或机构比例的上升是否增加股价波动。如果市场是散户主导的,那么散户比例的上升将加剧股价波动;如果市场是机构主导的,那么在特定情形下,机构比例的上升将加剧股价波动。第二,散户在长期均衡时不仅不会彻底消失,甚至会在特定情形下完全占据市场。 In this paper, assuming that there are only retail and institutional investors in the market and they behave differently based on both overconfidence and attention allocation on multi-period private information, we analyze the relationship between the investor structure and the stock price volatility. Meantime, we also study the long-run equilibrium of the investor structure. We conclude that when both behavior differences exist, first, the market contemporaneous investor structure decides whether the increase of the proportion of retail or institutional investors results in the increase of the stock price volatility. If retail investors dominate the market in quantity, the increase of their proportion will be followed with that of the stock price volatility; If institutional investors dominate the market, their growing can only increase the stock price volatility under certain circumstances. Second, the retail investors will survive the market and maybe occupy the whole market under certain circumstances in the long-run equilibrium.
出处 《南方经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期12-23,33,共13页 South China Journal of Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学基金(批准号:07JA630004) 国家自然科学基金(批准号:70871002 70671006)支持
关键词 投资者结构 股价波动 过度自信 注意力分配 Investor Structure Stock Price Volatility Overconfidence Attention Allocation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Benos A. V. , 1998, Aggressiveness and Survival of Overconfident Traders, Journal of Financial Markets, 1, 353 - 383.
  • 2Bemardo A.E. and Welch, I. , 2001, On the Evolution of Overconfidence and Entrepreneurs, Journal of Economics &Management Strategy, 10, 301 - 330.
  • 3Biais B. , Bossaerts, P. and Spatt, C. , 2005, Equilibrium Asset Pricing Under Heterogeneous Information, CMU Tepper School of Business, working paper.
  • 4Hirshleifer D. and Teoh, S. H. , 2004, Limited Investor Attention and Earningsrelated under and Over-reactions, Unpublished working paper, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • 5Hong H. and Stein, J. C. , 1999, A Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading and Overreaction in Asset Markets, The Journal of Finance, 54, 2143-2184.
  • 6Karceski J. and James M. , 2003, Captured Money? Differences in the Performance Characteristics of Retail and Institutional Mutual Funds, University of Florida, Working Paper; AFA 2003 Washington, DC Meetings.
  • 7Kyle A. S. and Wang F. A. , 1997, Speculation Duopoly with Agreement to Disagree : Can Overconfidence Survive the Market Test?, The Journal of Finance, 52, 2073 - 2090.
  • 8Odean T. , 1998, Volume, Volatility, Price and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average, The Journal of Finance, 53, 1887 - 1934.
  • 9Peng L. and Xiong, W. , 2006, Investor Attention, Overconfidence and Category Learning, Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 563 - 602.
  • 10高鸿桢,林嘉永.信息不对称资本市场的实验研究[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):63-71. 被引量:38

二级参考文献80

共引文献355

同被引文献146

引证文献13

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部