期刊文献+

不同分子遗传学方法用于自然流产绒毛细胞遗传分析的效果 被引量:21

Genetic analysis of chorionic villi specimen in spontaneous abortion using various methods
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨多重连接探针扩增法(MLPA)+荧光原位杂交(FISH)和比较基因组杂交(CGH)+FISH的分子遗传学方法用于自然流产绒毛细胞遗传分析的效果。方法收集29例自然流产绒毛组织以及6例选择性终止早期妊娠妇女的绒毛组织,采用CGH+FISH、MLPA+FISH方法进行遗传学分析,并与传统的绒毛细胞培养染色体核型分析结果进行比较。结果MLPA+FISH检测时间为40h,CGH+FISH检测时间为120h,绒毛细胞培养染色体核型分析时间为(240±72)h,3者分别比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。CGH、MLPA、FISH和绒毛细胞培养染色体核型分析的标本成功获检率分别为97%(34/35)、100%(35/35)、100%(35/35)和91%(32/35),4者比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.01)。除去CGH获检失败的1份样本外,MLPA+FISH与CGH+FISH的分析结果一致,CGH获检失败的1例标本经MLPA+FISH检测获得了结果。CGH+FISH或MLPA+FISH检测结果与绒毛细胞培养染色体核型分析结果的不一致率分别为13%(4/31)、12%(4/32),两者比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论MLPA+FISH检测耗时短,检测成功率高;MLPA+FISH检测用于自然流产绒毛细胞遗传分析是对绒毛细胞培养染色体核型分析方法的重要补充。 Objective To explore the efficacy of muhiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) combined with FISH in genetic analysis of chorionic villi specimen(CVS) of spontaneous abortion. Methods CGH + FISH and MLPA + FISH were used for genetic analysis of 29 CVS from spontaneous abortion and 6 normal CVS from selective abortion, in the mean time, those results were compared with conventional cytogenetic karyotyping. Results The report time were 40 hours in MLPA + FISH and 120 hours in CGH + FISH. The mean time of chorionic villi culture was (240±72)hours. The successful rate of specimen analysis were 97% (34/35) in CGH, 100% (35/35) in MLPA, 100% (35/35) in FISH and 91% (32/35) in conventional cytogenetic karyotyping. Apart from 1 case failed in CGH analysis, the results from MLPA + FISH were almost similar to that from CGH + FISH, however, that 1 specimen failed in CGH were detected successfully by MLPA + FISH. The discrepancy rate were 13% (4/31) in CGH + FISH and 12% (4/32) in MLPA + FISH respectively when compared with conventional cytogenetic analysis. Conclusions MLPA + FISH analysis present shorter detecting time and achieve 100% rate of successful report. This combined method was an important adjuvant approach to conventional cytogenetic karyotyping in CVS from spontaneous abortion.
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期253-256,共4页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
基金 广东省科技计划(2006B35901015)
关键词 流产 自然 绒毛膜绒毛 核酸探针 基因扩增 核酸杂交 原位杂交 荧光 Abortion, spontaneous Chorionic villi Nucleic acid probes Gene amplification Nucleic acid hybridization In situ hybridization, fluorescence
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Simpson JL. Causes of fetal wastage. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 50: 10-30.
  • 2Patrizio P, Bianchi V, Lalioti MD, et al. High rate of biological loss in assisted reproduction: it is in the seed, not in the soil. Reprod Biomed Online, 2007, 14: 92-95.
  • 3Bell KA, Van Deerlin PG, Haddad BR, et al. Cytogenetic diagnosis of "normal 46, XX" karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading. Fertil Steril, 1999, 71: 334-341.
  • 4Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science, 1992, 258: 818-821.
  • 5Schouten JP, McElgunn C J, Waaijer R, et al. Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucl Acids Res, 2002, 30: 57.
  • 6Daniely M, Barkai G, Goldman B, et al. Detection of numerical chromosome aberrations by comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn, 1999, 19: 100-104.
  • 7Koolen DA, Nillesen WM, Versteeg MH, et al. Screening for subtelomeric rearrangements in 210 patients with unexplained mental retardation using multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA). J Med Genet, 2004, 41 : 892-899.
  • 8Northrop EL, Ren H, Bruno DL, et al. Detection of cryptic subtelomerie chromosome abnormalities and identification of anonymous chromatin using a quantitative multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay. Hum Murat, 2005, 26: 477-486.
  • 9Berek JS.NOVAK妇科学.段涛,丰有古,译.13版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:105-106.
  • 10Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E, et al. Comparative genomie hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet, 2000, 66: 1516-1521.

同被引文献135

引证文献21

二级引证文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部