期刊文献+

纯钛烤瓷中微弧氧化处理的实验研究 被引量:4

The effect of microarc oxide film on titanium-ceramic bonding
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨微弧氧化处理应用对钛与瓷的结合强度的影响,摸索微弧氧化处理的适宜条件。方法:对钛表面进行喷砂、抛光、喷砂加微弧氧化处理和抛光加微弧氧化处理后,分为4组表面进行纯瓷粉烧结。根据ISO9693标准,对钛瓷间的三点弯曲结合强度进行测试。镍铬合金与瓷的结合强度测试结果为对照。结果:粗糙面微弧氧化组钛瓷结合强度(45.84±3.15MPa)与NiCr/VITA99组的结合强度(48.35±3.06MPa)相比,在统计学上无显著差异(P>0.05),却明显大于粗糙面组的结合强度(36.12±3.03MPa)(P<0.05);光滑面组钛/瓷结合强度(30.79±1.43MPa)明显小于粗糙面组光滑面组(P<0.01),但大于光滑面微弧氧化组(24.12±3.38MPa)(P<0.05)。结论:纯钛表面喷砂后进行微弧氧化处理,可有效地提高钛瓷的结合强度。 Objective: To assess the effect of microarc oxide film on titanium-ceramic bonding strength. Methods: Three-point bending test was used to evaluate the bond strength of Noritake Ti22 to pure titanium substrate which were prepared with four different surface treatment (polishing, sandblasting, polishing-microarc-oxidation and sandblasting-microarc-oxidation). The bond strength between the Ni-Cr alloy and conventional porcelain was chosen as control. Results: The bond strength of titanium substrate to Noritake Ti22(45.84± 3.15 MPa)using sandblasting-microarc-oxidation is almost equal to that of the NiCr to convention porcelain(48.35± 3.06MPa)(P〉0.05). But the bond strength of sandblasted titanium substrate to Noritake Ti22 (36.12 ± 3.03MPa) is higher than polished-titanium-Noritake Ti22(30.79± 1.43MPa)(P 〈0.05), which are also significantly lower than that of sandblasting-microarc-oxidation(P 〈0.01). Conclusion: The microarc oxide film on the surface of pure titanium with sandblasting can increase the titanium-ceramic bond strength.
出处 《口腔颌面修复学杂志》 2009年第2期69-72,共4页 Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics
基金 国家自然科学基金的资助项目(项目编号:30371557)
关键词 微弧氧化 纯钛 钛瓷 结合强度 microarc oxidation pure titanium porcelain bond strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献17

  • 1Van TB. Mechanism of Anodic Spark Deposition[J]. Am Ceram Soc Bulletin, 1977,56 (6): 563.
  • 2Zozulin A J. Anodized Coatings for Magnesium Alloys [ J ]. Met Finish, 1994,92 (3) : 39.
  • 3Xue W B,J Am Ceram Soc,1998年,81卷,5期,1365页
  • 4ISO 9693. Metal-ceramic dental restorative systems[J]. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization, 1999.
  • 5Wirz J, Jaeger K. Schmidlif modeme galvanotechnologie[J].Schweiz monztsschr Zahnmed, 1996, 106:643
  • 6Richard Van Noort. Introduction to Dental materials [M]. 2th ed. UK: Mosby, 2002: 251
  • 7Cascone P J, Nabatran D. Determination of thermal expansion compatibility limits for porcelain-metal systems [J]. J Dent Res,1982,61:330
  • 8DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ. Viscoelastic stress analysis of thermally compatible and incompatible metal-ceramic systems[J]. Dent Mater, 1998,14:237 ~ 245
  • 9Asaoka K, Tesk JA. Transient and residual stress in aporcelainmetal strip[J]. J Dent Res, 1990,69: 463 ~ 469
  • 10Coffey JP, Anusavice KJ, DeHoff PH, et al. Influence of ction mismatch and cooling rate on flexural failure of PFM systems[J]. J Dent Res, 1988,67:61 ~65

共引文献128

同被引文献73

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部