期刊文献+

心理干预联合舍曲林治疗老年抑郁症65例效果观察 被引量:6

A Comparative Study of Psychological Intervention with Sertraline in Elderly Patients with Depression(65Cases)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察心理干预联合舍曲林治疗老年抑郁症的效果。方法:将65例老年抑郁症患者随机分成两组,即研究组32例(采用心理干预联合舍曲林)和对照组33例(单用舍曲林),系统治疗8周;采用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定疗效,不良反应症状量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果:治疗第8周末,研究组总有效率为93.8%,对照组75.8%,两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.62,P<0.05);两组HAMD评分均较治疗前显著下降(P<0.01),研究组在2、6、8周末较对照组下降更显著(P<0.05,P<0.01)。两组治疗后各时段TESS评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:心理干预联合舍曲林治疗老年抑郁症比单纯服用舍曲林起效快,疗效好。 Objective:To assess efficacy of psychiatherapy with Sertaline in the treatment of elderly depression. Methods:A total of 65 elderly patients with depression episoders were randomly devided into groups ;32 intervention cases received psychotherapy with Sertaline)and 33 control cases received Sertaline respectively for 8 weeks. Both of the two groups used Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) for evaluating efficacy and the Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale (TESS) for evaluating side effects. Results:At the end of the 8th week of the study,the total effective rate of the study group was 93.8% , higher than 75.8% of the control group ( ~2 = 4.62,P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with pretreatment,significant difference was found in both groups (P 〈 0.01 ). The levels of depression were reduced. The scores of HAMD in the study group were significiantly lower than those in the control group ( P 〈 0.01 ). At the end of Week 2nd ,6th, and 8th week, the scores of the study group were significantly lower than that of the control group (P 〈0.05 ,P 〈0.01 ) ,but there was no statistical significance between the postoperation scores of both the groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion: Psychologial intervention combined with drug therapy is more effective than simple drug therapy in the treatment of elderly depression.
出处 《华北国防医药》 2009年第2期22-23,共2页 Medical Journal of Beijing Military Region
关键词 抑郁症 老年人 心理疗法 药物疗法 舍曲林 Depressive disorder Aged Psychotherapy Drug therapy Sertraline
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献19

  • 1龚耀先.艾森克个性问卷在我国的修订[J].心理科学通讯,1984,7(4):13-20. 被引量:219
  • 2方积乾 郝元涛.家庭环境评定量表(FES-CV)[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,:110-110.
  • 3吴文源.大体评定量表(GAS)[A].见:张明园主编.精神科评定量表手册:第2版[C].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1998.145-148.
  • 4王祖D.情感障碍[A].见:沈渔主编.精神病学:第3版[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.630-660.
  • 5张明园.精神科评定量表手册[M](第2版)[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2003.163-166,214-217.
  • 6张作记.行为医学量表手册[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,:118-119.
  • 7Flint AJ,Rifat SL. Two year outcome of psychotic depression in late life, Am J Psychiatry,1998,155(2):178-183.
  • 8Delano-Wood L,Abeles N.Late-life depression:detection,risk reduction,and somatic intervention[J].Clinical Psychology,2005,12:207-217.
  • 9Rabheru K.Special issues in the management of depression in older patients[J].Can J Psychiatry,2004,49:41-50.
  • 10Colenda CC,Mickus M,Marcus SC.et al.Comparing clinical practice with guideline recommendations for the treatment of depression in geriatric patients[J].Am J Geriatr Psychiatry,2003:448-457.

共引文献66

同被引文献66

引证文献6

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部