期刊文献+

生态护坡方案优选的模糊多准则群决策 被引量:3

Fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making approach prioritizing ecological revetment alternatives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对河道生态护坡的工程特点,提出了一种新的模糊多准则群决策方法求解定性值和定量值相结合的护坡方案优选问题。该方法采用三角模糊数和模糊左右评分法对语言变量进行处理,然后依据TOPSIS的决策思想,分别计算每个方案与正理想点和负理想点之间的距离,以距离正理想点最近同时又距负理想点最远为原则确定最优方案。最后用实例说明了该决策方法的有效性和可行性。 A new fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making approach is proposed for prioritizing the alternatives with qualitative and quantitative indicators. In this approach, the triangular fuzzy numbers and fuzzy marking method are first applied to transfer linguistic variables into crisp numbers to deal with the qualitative indicators. Then the distances of each alternative to the positive ideal solution and negative ideal solution are calculated to determine the ranking order of alternatives based on the idea of TOPSIS. The optimal alternative would have the shortest distance to the positive ideal solution and the longest one to the negative ideal solution. Finally, one engineering case is provided to illustrate the feasibility and the effectiveness of the proposed method.
出处 《辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第2期310-313,共4页 Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science)
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”资助项目(2006CB403405) 辽宁省自然科学基金资助项目(20052183)
关键词 河道治理 生态护坡 方案优选 群决策 river regulation ecological revetment alternatives prioritization group decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献52

  • 1王应明,傅国伟.运用无限方案多目标决策方法进行有限方案多目标决策[J].控制与决策,1993,8(1):25-29. 被引量:70
  • 2郭爱明.TOPSIS法在食品生产方案决策中的应用[J].食品科学,1994,15(1):3-5. 被引量:3
  • 3徐泽水.基于语言标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):84-88. 被引量:66
  • 4王文平.不完备信息下的多目标优化方法研究[J].系统工程学报,1996,11(2):1-6. 被引量:17
  • 5徐南荣 仲伟俊.科学决策理论与方法[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1996..
  • 6[1]Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Model for Computing with Words[J]. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems,2000,8(6) :746 - 752.
  • 7[2]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A Sequential Selection Process in Group Decision Making with Linguistic Assessment [J]. Information Science, 1995,85:233 - 239.
  • 8[3]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic Decision Analysis: Steps for Solving Decision Problems under Linguistic Information [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,115:67-82.
  • 9[4]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A Model of Consensus in Group Decision Making under Linguistic Assessments [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996,79:73 - 87.
  • 10[5]Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A Linguistic Modeing of Consensus in Group Decision Making Based on OWA Operators[J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans, 1997,27(1):126- 132.

共引文献198

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部