期刊文献+

髓内固定和动力髋螺钉固定治疗股骨转子周围骨折的疗效分析

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较髓内固定和动力髋螺钉(DHS)固定的优缺点,以期找到更有效的固定方式。方法对我院采用髓内钉和DHS治疗的127例股骨转子周围骨折进行回顾性总结分析。比较2种内固定方法治疗股骨转子周围骨折的侵袭性、术后骨折愈合时间、并发症及功能恢复情况。结果2组切口长度、术后发热时间、术中出血量、血红蛋白变化和术后并发症差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论髓内钉比DHS具有伤口暴露小、手术损伤程度小、固定强度牢靠、适用性广、并发症少、更有利于骨折愈合等优点,是一种治疗股骨转子周围骨折行之有效的内固定方法。
出处 《河北医药》 CAS 2009年第8期945-946,共2页 Hebei Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献31

  • 1张春林,曾炳芳,罗从风,陆男吉.股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨近端骨折疗效分析[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2004,19(9):597-599. 被引量:40
  • 2张经纬,蒋垚,张先龙,冯建翔,杨立峰,赵刘军,吴志军,黄雷,曾炳芳.股骨转子间骨折不同手术方法比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(1):7-11. 被引量:389
  • 3Wolfgang GL, Bryant MH, O' Neil JP. Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using sliding screw plate fixation. Clin Orthop, 1982, 163:148.
  • 4Haynes RC, Poll RG, Miles AW, et al. Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut out with the gamma locking nail and AO DHS. Injury, 1997, 28:337.
  • 5Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, et al. Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective randomised controlled trail. Injury, 1995, 26:615.
  • 6LJ Domingo, D Cecilia, A Herrera, et al. Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. International Orthopaedics,2001, 25:298.
  • 7Windolf J, Hollander DA, Hakimi M, et al. Pitfalls and complications in the use of the proximal femoral nail. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2004, 15:423.
  • 8Rappold G, Hertz H, Spitaler R. Implant breakage of the proximal femoral nail (PFN). European Journal of Trauma, 2001, 27:333.
  • 9Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, Riand N, Stem R,Hoffmeyer P. Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 2002, 84: 372-381.
  • 10Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ. Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 2001, 83: 643-650.

共引文献215

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部