期刊文献+

中国煤炭行业市场结构与经济绩效实证研究 被引量:10

An Empirical Study on the Market Structure and Performance in Chinese Coal Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用中国煤炭行业产业和公司数据,结合市场化进程加快和经济周期起落的背景,首次测算了1979-2007年中国煤炭行业市场集中度,认为2007年以后市场结构出现类似寡头竞争的特征。根据中国煤炭行业的特殊性,提出决定产业绩效的理论模型,包含产业集中度、供需基本面、安全研发投入等关键要素。实证结果表明:产业利润率与市场集中度显著正相关;公司利润率与市场份额正相关,而与研发投入负相关,后者是由煤炭行业的特殊性决定的。为了国民经济长足发展和国家能源供应安全,应提前加大对国有煤矿投资,保持适度供过于求;支持煤炭企业集团的兼并重组,同时鼓励竞争。 This study calculates the concentration ratio (CR) of Chinese coal industry from 1979 to 2007, which shows the market structure is para - oligarchy competition since 2007. This paper presents an academic model about coal industry performance including industry concentration ratio, supply and demand, expenditure for safety and industry policy due to the industrial particularity. The empirical results are as follows: (1) that the industry profit rate is positively related to the concentration ratio, and (2) that within coal industry, those firms with the larger market shares have higher rates of profit, but a negative correlation between company profit rate and R&D. The government should increase investment to those state-owned mines in advance to keep moderate oversupply and support those groups to merge, inspiring them to compete as well, in order to ensure economy development and energy supply.
出处 《统计与信息论坛》 CSSCI 2009年第4期36-41,共6页 Journal of Statistics and Information
基金 国家自然科学基金项目<衰退矿区优势要素向西部能源富集地转移研究>(90510010) 教育部博士点基金项目<衰退矿区优势要素与西部能源资源耦合研究>(20050287026)
关键词 煤炭行业 市场结构 寡头竞争 经济绩效 能源安全 coal industry market structure oligarchy competition performance energy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Peltzman S. The gains and losses from industrial concentration[J]. Journal of Law and Economies, 1977(20) :229 -263.
  • 2Choi B P, Weiss M A. An empirical evaluation of market structure, efficiency, and performance in property- liability insurance[J]. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2005(4) :635 - 673.
  • 3Scherer, et al. The validity of studies with line of business data: comment[J]. American Economic Review, 1987(1) :205 - 217.
  • 4Conyon M J. Industry profit margins and concentration: evidence from UK manufacturing[J]. International Review of Applied Economics, 1995(9) :275 - 290.
  • 5Gerard G, Kamerschen D, Delorme C. Market structure and price- cost margins in Philippine manufacturing industries[J]. Applied Economic, 1999(31) :857 - 864.
  • 6Slade M E. Models of firm profitability[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2004(3): 289 - 308.
  • 7Prince Y, Thurik R. The interternporal stability of the concentration- margins relationship in Dutch and U.S. manufacturing [J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 1994(9):193-209.
  • 8Zaralis G. Profitability, concentration and trade flows: issues of non- linearity and exogeneity[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 1991(3) : 215- 229.
  • 9Yoon S. A note on the market structure and performance in Korean manufacturing industries[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2004(26): 733- 746.
  • 10Bloch H. Sample- Selection procedures for estimating the relationship between concentration and profitability from crossindustry data[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 1994(9) : 71 - 84.

二级参考文献12

  • 1植草益.《产业组织论》[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998..
  • 2马建堂.结构与行为--中国产业组织研究[M].中国人民大学出版社.1993
  • 3J.S. Bain, Industrial Organization, New York, Harvard University Press, 1959.
  • 4The Changing Structure of the U.S. Coal Industry: AnUpdate, DOE/EIA 0513(93) Distribution Category UC 98,7/ 93.
  • 5Richard Bonskowski, The U.S. Coal Industry in the1990' s: Low Prices and Record Production , DOE/EIA, Sep/1999.
  • 61994~2001年煤炭供需回顾,美国能源部情报所(www.eia.doe.gov),2002年5月.
  • 7《中草药国能源发展报告(2001)》,中国计量出版社,2001年版,第4页.
  • 8潘克西.《国家产业政策对煤炭工业的影响》[J].世界经济文汇,1999,:393-393.
  • 9[美]G.J.施蒂格勒.《产业组织和政府管制》,上海人民出版社、上海三联书店,1996年版,第3页.
  • 10国家经济贸易委员会.《“十五”工业规划与发展战略—国家经济贸易委员会“十五”行业规划》,经济科学出版社,2001年版,第110页.

共引文献47

同被引文献61

引证文献10

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部