摘要
陈乾初《大学辨》与诸家《大学》研究的不同之处在于,他对《大学》的经典性提出了质疑。自宋以降,学者对《大学》的研究主要集中在成书年代、版本、解释、真伪四个方面。《大学辨》分别对这四个问题进行了回答,且从"迹""理"角度阐明《大学》非圣人所作。
In"Debate of Daxue", Chen Qian-chu proposes his doubt on"Daxue". The study on"Daxue"mainly focuses on its publication time, versions, explanations and its authenticity, while in "Debate of Daxue", Chen Qian-chu answers all those questions and proposes that it is not written by some sages.
出处
《渤海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2009年第3期64-70,共7页
Journal of Bohai University:Philosophy & Social Science Edition
关键词
大学
大学辨
迹理说
Daxue, Debate of Daxue, sayings about Ji ( trace ) and Li (ration)