两种不同雾化吸入疗法对儿童哮喘的疗效观察与护理

Clinical Observation and Nursing of Two Different Atomization Inhalation Treatments on Asthma Children

目的:探讨不同雾化吸入方法对儿童哮喘的疗效影响与护理。方法:将76例支气管哮喘患儿随机分为实验组(39例)予以氧气驱动雾化吸入疗法;对照组予以空气压缩泵雾化吸入疗法,辅以正确的护理,观察两组雾化吸入前后血氧饱和度(SpO2)的变化及临床症状消失的时间。结果:两组在改善SpO2和临床症状消失时间均有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:不同雾化吸入方式对儿童哮喘的疗效有影响,氧驱雾化更适合于儿童哮喘的治疗。

Objective： To explore the effects of different atomization inhalation treatments on clinical effects of asthma children and nursing. Methods： 76 patients with bronchial asthma were divided into two groups. Experimental groups （39） and control group （37）. With appropriate nursing, asthma children in the experimental group are treated with oxygen driving atomization inhalation, while those in the control group are eared with eompression aerosol inhalation. The changes of SpO2 of both groups before and after atomization inhalation treatment and the time for clinical symptoms to disappear were observed. Results： The experimental group has gained the signifieanee in the improvement of SpO2 and the time for the elinical symptoms to disappear （P〈 0.01）. Conclusion： Different atomization inhalation treatments have different effects on clinical effects of asthma children. Oxygen driving atomization inhalation would be more appropriate.