摘要
五卅运动时期,马寅初严格区分经济绝交与抵制日货两大范畴,极力反对前者而鼓吹后者,认为经济绝交将引发国内金融恐慌,而抵制日货则既能促进民族经济发展,亦可借以收回关税主权。随着中日关系恶化和民族危机深化,他逐渐模糊二者边界,将经济抵制与武力反抗视为同等重要的抗日手段。抵制日货运动之持久展开,既受日本反抵制措施的约束,又与自身经济发展水平与民众民族意识强弱密切关联。对抵制日货功效的乐观固守与运动困境的深刻洞悉,则彰显出经济理性与民族主义之间的复杂纠葛。抵制日货运动固有的政治与经济两大向度之间的历史性悖论,国人至今依然难以破解。
In the May 30 Movement, Ma Yin-chu clearly distinguished the severance of economic relations and the boycott of Japanese goods, strongly objecting to the former and advocating the latter. He believed that severing Sino-Japanese economic relations would trigger domestic financial panic and that boycotting Japanese goods could both boost national economy. and help regain tariff autonomy. With the deterioration of Sino-Japanese relations and the deepening of national crisis. he gradually blurred the distinction between the two, treating economic and armed resistance as equally important meant of fighting against the Japanese. The boycott of Japanese goods was both restrained by Japanese anti-boycott measures and closely related to economic development and national consciousness in China. Ma's optimistic defense of the boycott and insightful vision of the movement manifested his complex entanglement between economic rationality and nationalism. The historic dilemma between the political and economic dimensions of the boycott movement still bewilders the Chinese people today.
出处
《贵州财经学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期15-20,共6页
Journal of Guizhou College of Finance and Economics
基金
国家社科基金西部项目"抵制日货运动的历史困境(1908-1945)"阶段成果(项目编号:08XZS012)
关键词
马寅初
经济绝交
抵制日货
民族主义
经济理性
Ma Yin-chu
severance of economic relations
boycott of Japanese goods
nationalism
economic rationality