美国、英国、澳大利亚的高等教育国际化被引量：119

Internationalization of Higher Education in the U.S.,U.K.,and Australia

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文研究美国、英国和澳大利亚的高等教育国际化。通过采用一个共同的分析框架,分析这三个发达国家高等教育系统的国际化背景、国际化战略、政府和专业机构的国际化角色以及国际化的评估,并对个别研究型大学进行个案研究,以说明国际化是如何在大学内落实的。结果说明高等教育学国际化是受大学外部的全球化、科技和竞争等因素推动以及大学内部的文化和组织等因素影响。这三个国家的高等教育国际化在历史背景、广泛战略和评估方面有相同的经验,但在地区政治、传统和政府的角色方面有明显的不同。 This is a study of the internationalization of higher education in the United States, the United Kingdom,and Australia.Using a common conceptual framework,the study explains the historical context,strategies,the role of government and professional organizations,as well as the evaluation of the internationalization of the higher-education system in each of these three advanced industrialized countries.It also explains how internationalization is implemented at the institutional level by presenting case studies of selected research universities.The study finds that higher-education internationalization is driven by globalization,technological change,and competition factors external to the institution and is further shaped by cultural and organizational factors internal to the institution.The three countries share similar internationalization experiences in terms of the larger historical context,broad categories of strategies,and issues of evaluation;however they also differ significantly in terms of geographical politics and tradition,and the role of the government.

作者曾满超王美欣蔺乐

机构地区哥伦比亚大学教育学院

出处《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期75-102,共28页 Peking University Education Review

关键词高等教育国际化美国英国澳大利亚

分类号 G649.1 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献45

1Knight, J. (2006). Internationalization: Concepts, Complexities and Challenges. International Handbook of Higher Education. The Netherlands, Springer.
2Ahbach, F. (2006). Globalization and the University: Realities in an Unequal World. International Handbook of Higher Education. The Netherlands. Springer.
3Tsang, M. & Yu, Z. (2008). Internationalization of higher education in China and Japan. New York: Center on Chinese Education, Teachers College Columbia University.
4Habu, T. (2000). The irony of globalization: The experience of Japanese women in British highe education. Higher Education, 39, 43-66.
5American Council on Education, Center for International Initiatives (2002). The brave new (and smaller) world of Higher Education: Transatlantic view. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved on November 24, 2007, from www. acenet, edu/ bookstore.
6Dobbert, M.J. ( 1998 ). The impossibility of internationalizing student by adding materials to course. In Mestenhauser, J.A. and Ellingboe. B. (eds.) , Reforming the Higher Education curriculum. Internationalizing the campus. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx Press, pp. 53-68.
7Schoorinan, D. (1999). The pedagogical implications of diverse conceptualizations of internationalization : A U.S. based case study. Journal of Studies in International Education, 3, 19-46.
8Merkx, G. (2003). The two waves of internationalization in U. S. higher education. International Educator, 12( 1 ) , 6-12.
9Burn, B.B. and Smuckler, R.H. (1995). A research agenda for the internationalization of Higher Education in the United States. Carbondale, IL: Association of International Education Administrators.
10Edwards, J. (2007). Challenges and opportunities for the internationalization of Higher Education in the coming decade: Planned and opportunistic initiatives in American institutions. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 373-382.