期刊文献+

卫生筹资与卫生系统绩效之间的关系及对中国的启示研究 被引量:3

A Study on the Relationship Between Health Financing and Health System Performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探索卫生筹资对卫生系统绩效的影响,为筹资模式的设计提供依据。方法:以经济合作发展组织(OECD)29个国家为研究样本,将其筹资模式分为税收与社会保险筹资两种方式,采用多元线性回归模型,构建卫生筹资模式及有关变量与卫生系统绩效间的回归模型。结果:税收筹资模式国家的卫生系统绩效总体优于社会保险模式的国家。政府卫生投入、卫生支出、GDP等筹资指标与卫生系统绩效正向相关。结论:税收筹资模式能更好地改善卫生系统绩效。中国卫生筹资应优先考虑税收筹资制度。 Objective: The purpose of this study is to explore the quantitative relationship between health financing and health system performance and to find out the better financing model. Methods: Twenty nine OECD countries were selected as the sample and they were grouped into two categories as tax and social-insurance financing model. Multiple-regression was used to construct the relationship between health financing and health system performance. Results: The model showed that the general-tax financing model was better than social health insurance model in term of health system performance in OECD countries. The government health expenditures and the proportion of total health expenditure to GDP positively related with health system performance. Conclusions: The general-tax financing model is superior to social health insurance model in term of improving health system performance. China should select the general-tax financing model as the first choice in designing the health system.
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2009年第5期20-24,共5页 Chinese Health Economics
基金 北京市科技新星计划专项资助(9558103000)
关键词 卫生筹资 卫生系统绩效 回归模型 OECD国家 health financing health system performance regression model OECD countries
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Kruk ME, Freedman LP. Assessing health system performance in developing countries: A review of the literature[J], Health Policy. 2007:2-4.
  • 2WHO. Financing options for free access fact sheet[M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005: 2-6.
  • 3WHO. Designing health financing systems to reduce catastrophic health[M]. Expenditure, 2005:1-5.
  • 4WHO. The World Health Report 2000[M]. Geneva: WHO, 2000: 11-50.
  • 5OECD. http://www, oecd.org/home, accessed on Jan.10, 2009.
  • 6World Bank. WDI statistics[R]. World Bank, 2005.
  • 7Carrin G, James C. Reaching universal coverage via social health insurance: Key design features in the transition period[R], World Health Organization, 2004: 2-48.
  • 8Gottret P, Schieber G. Health financing revisited[R]. The World Bank,2006: 48-320.
  • 9WHO. Tax-based financing for health systems: Options and experiences, 2004:5-17.
  • 10Wagstaff A. Social health insurance vs. tax-financed health systemsevidence from the OECD[R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2007: 3-34.

二级参考文献12

共引文献59

同被引文献10

  • 1卫生部.2010年我国卫生事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2011-04-29) [2011-06-10]. http://www, moh. gov. cn/ publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/mohwsbwstjxxzx/s7967/ 201104/51512. htm.
  • 2国民经济和社会发展第十二个五年规划纲要(全文)[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/2011lh/eontent_1825838.htm.2011-3-16.
  • 3..中共中央政治局第二十次集体学习[EB/OL]..http://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2010-05/ 29/content_1616407.htm,,(2010-05-29)[2011-04-25]..
  • 4Tragakes E,Lessof S.In:Tragakes E.,ed.Health care systems in transition:Russian Federation.Copenhagen,European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies,2003:22.
  • 5World Health Organization.Essential medicines[EB/OL].[2011 -04-25].http://www.who.int/medicines/services/essmedicines_def/en/index.html.
  • 6Kenneth J,Arrow.Uncertainty and welfare economics of medical care[J].Bulletin of WHO,2004,82 (2):141-149.
  • 7Oxman A D,Bj(φ)rndal A,Becerra-Posada F,et al.A framework for mandatory impact evaluation to ensure well informed public policy decisions[J].Lancet,2010,375 (9712):427431.
  • 8新华网.中共中央政治局第三十五次集体学习[EB/OL].http :// news3, xinhuanet, com/ video/ 2006- 10/ 24/ content 5244468. htm. 2006, 10,24.
  • 9雷海潮.实现人人享有基本医疗卫生服务的关键问题探讨[J].卫生经济研究,2008,25(5):3-5. 被引量:34
  • 10母玉清,蒲川.我国医疗机构绩效管理历程的文献研究[J].重庆医学,2013,42(4):472-473. 被引量:6

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部