摘要
关于秦朝疆域四至,司马迁和秦朝的琅邪刻石各自给出了一个说法,然揆诸史实,司马迁的始皇26年的四至实为始皇33年的四至。而琅邪刻石四至中的西、北二至直到秦朝灭亡也没有达到。司马迁的四至说显然属于误书,而琅邪刻石四至说既可视为秦人在故意夸大自己的功业,又可视为其意在表达一定要在南北用兵的决心。
There are two versions about Qin Dynasty＇s border city Sizhi. Records of the Historian and Langya Stone Scripture provide two different records of Qin Dynasty＇s border Sizhi. The paper discloses that both records are wrong after an in--depth research. Records of the Historian made an incorrect record of time, while Langya Stone Scripture exaggerated Qin＇s border on purpose.
出处
《盐城师范学院学报（人文社会科学版）》
2009年第2期66-69,共4页
Journal of Yancheng Teachers University（Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
《史记》
秦朝
疆域
Records of the Historian
Qin Dynasty
border city
