《测量全义》与《量地指南》比较研究

A comparative study on Celiangquanyi and Liangdizhinan

目的深入分析、比较《测量全义》与《规矩元法》中的各种测量方法。方法文献比较、分析。结果两部典籍中的测量内容均有较大发展,但在一些实际测量科目,如导线测量、水准高程测量中,《量地指南》中记述的测量方法具有明显的优势。结论17世纪中叶至18世纪中叶,日本的测量技术水平略好于中国。

Aim To make a deep analysis and comparison on Celiangquanyi and Guijuyuanfa in various measurement methods. Methods Analysis of the Literature; Comparison. Results The two books are of larger measurement of content development, but some of the actual measurement subjects, such as leading measurement, the standard measurement of height in the Liangdizhinan described in the measurement method has obvious advantages. Conclusion In the mid-17th century to the mid-18th century, Japan＇s level of measurement technology is a little better than that of China.