期刊文献+

在行动与规则之间——论效用主义与道义论的关系问题 被引量:3

Debate between Rule-utilitarianism and Act-utilitarianism:A Preliminary Study on the Relationship between Deontology and Utilitarianism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行动效用主义是传统的效用主义形式,而规则效用主义则是新效用主义的主要代表。在两种理论之间集中了很多关注和争论。作为复兴了效用主义的新理论形态,规则效用主义一方面给效用计算问题带来了新的困境,但另一方面却对处理效用主义与道义论的关系问题具有重要意义,即引发了效用主义对道义论的调和关系。然而,这种新的理论动向并未获得行动效用主义一方的认可和支持,因为后者明确反对像"道义论"那样以规则作为道德评判的直接标准。 Act-utilitarianism is a traditional form introduces new contents into the modern form of representation of teleology in moral philosophy, great effects on human life. However, problems util uti an between act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. 0 problems and difficulties to the calculation of utility; role on the relationship between deontology and util of utilitarianism, while rule-utilitarianism itarianism, thus refreshes this theory. As a litarianism is an important theory and has d difficulties still exist, such as the debate n one hand, rule-utilitarianism on the other hand, it also p itarianism, to which act-ut ays brings new a significant litarianism does not consent.
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期27-33,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
关键词 效用主义 规则效用主义 道义论 行动效用主义 统合效用主义 utilitarianism rule-utilitarianism deontology act-utilitarianism unified utilitarian theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Geoffrey Scarre, Utilitarianism, London :Routledge London and New York Company, 1996.
  • 2王立峰.评罗尔斯的规则功利主义惩罚思想[J].国家行政学院学报,2004(2):42-45. 被引量:5
  • 3Daniel E. Palmer, "On the Viability of a Rule Utilitarianism," The Journal of Value Inquiry ,No. 33(1999), pp. 31 - 42.
  • 4盛庆琜.《综论效用主义》[J].浙江大学学报:人文社会科学版,2008,01.
  • 5张华夏.《统合效用主义的理论贡献以及问题--简评盛庆珠新功利主义》[J].开放时代,2001,(1):120-123.
  • 6M. Ridge, "Introducing Variable-rate Rule-utilitarianism," Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 223(2006), pp. 242- 253.
  • 7John C, Harsanyi, "Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior," Social Research, Vol. 44, No. 4 ( 1977), pp. 39 - 62.

二级参考文献5

  • 1[1][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]John Rawls, "Two concepts of Rules," in Hugh LaFollette, Editor, Ethics in Practice: An Anthology, Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 1997.
  • 2[2]Plato, Protagoras, Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1982, p16.
  • 3[3]E. Westermarck, The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, London, Second edition, 1912, Vol.1, pp.81-82.
  • 4[12]Punishing Dangerousness: Cloaking Preventive Detention as Criminal Justice, Harvard Law Review, Vol.114, No.5(2001).
  • 5[13][15](美)约翰*罗尔斯.正义论[M],何怀宏等(译).北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.

共引文献6

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部