期刊文献+

基于多时期的分销渠道成员长期性努力补偿激励机制 被引量:2

A Study on Long-term Efforts Compensating Mechanisms of Distribution Channel Members for Being Based on More Period
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了1个制造商和1个零售商构成的分销渠道,将零售商的服务分为短期性服务和基于顾客满意的长期性服务,由于长期性服务对销售量的影响具有滞后性,因此,建立了多时期渠道动态决策模型。在此基础上,分析了3种情况:①制造商对零售商的长期性服务不激励(CCS);②制造商对零售商的长期性服务激励(CICS);③渠道整合(CI)。结果表明:如果制造商不对零售商激励,零售商也有长期性服务偏好;如果对零售商激励,那么零售商付出的长期性服务更多,他们的努力程度由零售商利润的贴现系数决定。同时CI时,渠道总利润要优于其余2种情况。制造商对零售商激励时双方的利润均大于不激励时的利润,CI时双方的利润与他们的分配比例有关。 The distribution channel, which has one manufacturers and one retailer, was studied in the pa per. The retailer's service was composed of short-term service and customer satisfaction. In the paper, channel dynamic decision mode ong-term service for being based on was constituted, because long-term service affects market with delay, On the base of this, three cases were analyzed.manufacturers didn't incent retailer for long-term service(CCS), manufacturer motivated retailer for long-term service(CICS), and channel integration(CI). The results show the retailer favors long-term service, even if manufacturers don't incentive retailer;The retailer pays more long-term service if manufacturers motivated retailer;Their effort is made by the retailer's a discounts factor to future profits. At same time, channel total profits is more than the two others in the channel integration. If manufacturers motivated retailer, manufacturer and re- tailer's profits are more than no incentive, In the channel integration, their profits are related with their assigning proportionment.
作者 丁川 王开弘
出处 《系统管理学报》 北大核心 2009年第2期158-164,共7页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 西南财经大学科研基金资助项目(QN0818)
关键词 渠道 合作 长期性努力 激励 channel coordination long-term efforts incentive
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1McGuire T W, Staelin R. An industry equilibrium Analyses of down stream vertical integration [J]. Marketing Science, 1983,2(2) : 161-191.
  • 2Jeuland A P,Shugan S M. Managing channel profits [J]. Marketing Science, 1983,2(3) :239-272.
  • 3Coughlan. Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice: theory and application [J]. Marketing Science, 1985,4(2) : 110-129.
  • 4Choi S C. Price competition in a channel structure common retailer[J]. Marketing Science, 1991, 10 (2):271-290.
  • 5Eitan Gerstner, James D Hess, Pull promotion and channel structure coordination [J]. Marketing Science, 1995,14(1):43-59.
  • 6Lee E,Staelin R. Vertical strategic interaction : implications for channel pricing strategy [J]. Marketing Science, 1997,16(3) : 185-207.
  • 7Ramarao Desiraju,Sridhar Moorthy. Managing a distribution channel under asymmetric information with performance requirements [J]. Management Science, 1997,43(12): 1628-1644.
  • 8Jagmohan Raiu, Zhang Z J. Channel coordination in the presence of a dominant retailer [J]. Marketing Science, 2005,24(2): 254-262.
  • 9Wujin C, Desai P S. Channel coordination mechanisms for customer satisfaction tion[J].Marketing science, 1995,14(4) :343-359.
  • 10Cao To Linh, Yushin Hong. Channel coordination through a revenue sharing contract in a two-period newsboy problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,32(1):1-8.

二级参考文献20

  • 1[1]Goodman L E,Dion P A.The determinants of commitment in the distributor-manufacturer relationship[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2001,30:287-300.
  • 2[2]Coughlan Anne T,Erin Anderson,Louis W,et al.EI-ansary,marketing channels[M].Sixth Edition,Printice Hall,2001.
  • 3[3]Heiko Wolter,Frank Schuler,Explaining supplierbuyer partnerships:a dynamic game theory approach[J].European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,1997,3:155-164.
  • 4[4]Lilliecreutz Johan.Orchestrating resource base,role,and position:a supplier's strategy in buyer-dominated relationships[J].European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,1998,4:73-75.
  • 5[5]Rapoport A,Chammah A M.Prison study of conflict and cooperation[R].University of Ann Arbor,1965.
  • 6[6]Morehous L G,One-play,two-play and ten-play runs of prisoner's dilemma[J].Journal of Conflict Resolution,1967,11:354-362.
  • 7[7]Rosenthal R W.Games of perfect information,predatory pricing and the chain-store paradox on[J].Journal of Economic Theory,1981,25:92-100.
  • 8Ricardo Ernst, Stephen G Powell. Manufacturer incentives to improve retail service levels[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998,(104):437-450.
  • 9Corbett C J, Tang C S. Designing supply contracts: contract type and information asymmetry[M]. Boston, Kluwer: Chapter 9 in the Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, 1999.
  • 10Bernheim D, Michael Whinston. Command agency[J]. Econometrica, 1986, 54:923-942.

共引文献30

同被引文献54

  • 1张鹏.数据分析市场升温 运营商借数据分析推动智能管道布局[J].通信世界,2011(39):38-38. 被引量:1
  • 2田盈,蒲勇健.多任务委托——代理关系中激励机制优化设计[J].管理工程学报,2006,20(1):24-26. 被引量:45
  • 3让-雅克·拉丰 激励理论.大卫·马赫蒂摩,委托代理模型[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..
  • 4Mirrless J. An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1971,38:175-208,.
  • 5Ross S. The economic theory of agency-the principal's preblem [A]. Papers and Proceedings of Eight-fifth Annual Meeting of American Economic As- sociation[C]. 1973.
  • 6Holmstrom B, Paul M. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of inter tem- p0ral incentives[J]. Econometrica, 1987,55 (2): 303-328.
  • 7Holmstrom B, Paul M. Multi-task principal-agent analyses: incentive con- tracts, asset ownership and job design [J].Journal of Law, Economics and Or- ganization, 1991,(7):24-52.
  • 8Bernheim D, Whinston M. Common marketing agenty as a device for facili- tating collusion[J].The Rand Journal of Economics, 1985,16(2):269-281.
  • 9Brnheim D, Whinston M. Common agency [J]. Econometrica, 1986, 54(4): 923-942.
  • 10Myerson R. Optimal Coordination mechanism in generalized principal-a- gent problem[J].Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1982, (10) :67 -81.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部