期刊文献+

前哨淋巴结检测在胃癌诊断中的作用 被引量:2

The Clinical Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胃癌前哨淋巴结检测(SLNB)的临床价值。方法使用亚甲蓝对40例胃癌患者行前哨淋巴结术中标识活检,随后行D2或D2以上手术。结果本组病例SLN预测胃周淋巴结转移的敏感性为91.67%(22/24),假阴性率为8.83%(2/24),准确率为94.87%(37/39)。SLN在第1站占87.18%(34/39);检出率依次:No3、No4、No5、No6等。SLN在第2站占12.82%(5/39);检出率依次:No7、No8等。同时,SLN预测胃周淋巴结转移的敏感性和准确率随胃癌浸润深度的增加而降低,T1期敏感性和准确率为100%,T3期的敏感性为84.62%(11/13),准确率88.23%(15/17)。22例转移的SLN中,3例SLN为唯一转移部位,且均为T1、T2期。结论SLNB符合胃癌的一般淋巴结转移规律和"跳跃性转移"特点,能准确反映胃癌的淋巴结转移状况,更适于早期胃癌的检测;可能提高胃癌淋巴结微转移的检出率和胃癌分期的准确性及有望指导胃癌淋巴结清扫具有临床价值。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in gastric cancer. Methods Forty patients with gastric cancer intraoperatively underwent lymphatic mapping and SLNB with methylene blue. Resuits The sensitivity of SLN status in the diagnosis of the lymph node metastasis status of the patients was 91.67% (22/24), false negative rate was 8. 83% (2/24) and accuracy was 94. 87% (37/39). SLN was identified in the first station lymph nodes for 34 (87.18%) of the 39 cases and the second station for other 5 ( 12. 82% ) cases. The sensitivity and accuracy of SLN status lowered with the increasing invasion depth of gastric cancer. In T1 group, the sensitivity and accuracy was 100%, 100%. In T3 group, the sensitivity and accuracy was 84. 62% (11/13), 88. 23% (15/17). 22 patients were found to have lymph node metastasis in SLNs, 3 in SLNs alone. Conclusion SLNB accurately predict the lymph node metastasis status, improve the efficiency of detection of hymph node micrometastasis, improve accuracy rate of staging and guide lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.
出处 《实用心脑肺血管病杂志》 2009年第4期311-312,共2页 Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease
关键词 胃癌 前哨淋巴结检测 临床价值 Gastric cancer Sentinel lymph node biopsy Methylene blue
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1PalaiaR, Cremona F, Delrio P, et al. Sentinelnodebiop syingas triccancer [J]. JChemother, 1999, 11 : 230 -231.
  • 2Elias D, Lasser P, Duvillard P. Thesentinel ymphnodeincarcoinomaof thedige stivetact [J]. Bull Cancer, 2002, 89:593-598.
  • 3徐惠绵,陈峻青,王舒宝.胃癌的淋巴结转移规律及其意义[J].中国肿瘤临床,2001,28(6):465-468. 被引量:16
  • 4Sano T, Katai H, Sasako M, et al. Gastricly pmphographyand detctionofsentinelndes [ J]. RecentResults Cancers, 2000, 157:253 - 258.

二级参考文献17

共引文献15

同被引文献17

  • 1林云笑,黄活勋,潘岐作.单药希罗达治疗晚期乳腺癌和结直肠癌疗效观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2005,13(2):247-248. 被引量:22
  • 2胡国洪,何耀武.胃癌分化程度、淋巴结转移和Hp感染与Bcl-2基因表达的关系[J].国际医药卫生导报,2006,12(14):11-12. 被引量:3
  • 3Parkin DM,Bray F,Ferlay J,et al.Global cancer statistics,2002[J].Cancer J Clin,2005,55:74-108.
  • 4ShiraishiN,Adachi Y,Kitano S,et al.Gastric cancerwith extra gastric lymph node metastasis:multivariate prognostic study[J].Gastric Cancer,2000,3(4):211-218.
  • 5Bostanci EB,Kayaalp C,Ozogul Y,et al.Comparis on of comp lications after D2 and D3 dissection for gastric cancer[J].Eur J Surg Oncol,2004,30(1):202-225.
  • 6Higgins JPT,Green S.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0[updated March 2011] [EB/OL].The Cochrane Collaboration,2011.Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 7Zhang Hao,Liu Caigang,Wu Di,et al.Does D3 surgery offer a better survival outcome compared to D1 surgery for gastric cancer? A result based on a hospital population of two decades as taking D2 surgery for reference[J].BMC Cancer,2010,10:308.
  • 8Kunisaki C,Akiyama H,Nomura M,et al.Comparison of surgical pesults of D2 versus D3 gastrectomy(para-aortic lymph node dissection) for advanced gastric carcinoma:a multi-institutional study[J].Annals of Surgical Oncology,2006,13(5):659-667.
  • 9Günther K,Horbach T,Merkel S,et al.D3 Lymph node dissection in gastric cancer:evaluation of postoperative mortality and complications[J].Surg Today,2000,30:700-705.
  • 10孙燕 周际昌.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.586-591.

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部