期刊文献+

丁螺环酮与地西泮治疗焦虑症双盲比较 被引量:18

Buspirone vs diazepam in treating anxiety disorders in a double_blind study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较丁螺环酮与地西泮治疗焦虑症的疗效及不良反应。方法:采用随机双盲对照研究的方法,分为丁螺环酮组23例(男性11例,女性12例;年龄38±s13a),予丁螺环酮15mg,po,tid;4wk为一个疗程。地西泮组22例(男性9例,女性13例;年龄41±13a),予地西泮7.5mg,po,tid;4wk为一个疗程。结果:丁螺环酮组有效率为87%,地西泮组91%,2组比较Ridit分析P>0.05。药物不良反应发生率地西泮组高于丁螺环酮组,但反应轻微不影响治疗。结论:丁螺环酮与地西泮疗效相同,不良反应少。 AIM: To compare the effects and adverse reactions of buspirone and diazepam in treating anxiety disorders. METHODS: Forty_five anxious patients were divided randomly into 2 groups: 23 patients (M 11, F 12, age 38±s 13 a) were treated with buspirone, 15 mg, po, tid for 4 wk; 22 patients (M 9, F 13, age 41±11 a) were treated with diazepam, 7.5 mg, po, tid for 4 wk. RESULTS: The total clinical effective rates were 87% for buspirone, and 90% for diazepam (P>0.05). The adverse reactions in diazepam group was higher than in buspirone group. But this did not hinder the treatment because the adverse reactions were mild. CONCLUSION: Buspirone showed the same effects but less adverse reactions than diazepam.
出处 《中国新药与临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1998年第2期99-100,共2页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
关键词 丁螺环酮 地西泮 焦虑症 双盲法 buspirone diazepam anxiety disorders double_blind method
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1徐济民,临床实用新药手册,1996年,146页
  • 2团体著者,中国精神疾病分类方案与诊断标准(第2版),1995年,79页

同被引文献80

引证文献18

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部