期刊文献+

逻辑研究:本质的反思与理论的风险

Research on Logic:Thinking to the Nature and Theoretical Risks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 古代逻辑源于对辩论传统中真实论证的研究,但是之后数个世纪,这门学科变得高度抽象化,高度理论化。高度抽象化、理论化的背后潜伏着某种风险:距离普通人越来越远;与数学的界限越来越模糊;学科界定的错位。逻辑研究将何去何从?逻辑的目的是如何使我们有效地思维,从而作出对与错的判定,逻辑研究也应该回归到这一普遍的意义上来,唯有如此,逻辑才能走入大众,逻辑的力量才能得到彰显。 Logic arose in Antiquity from the study of the real argumentation in the tradition of debate. Over the centuries that followed, the discipline tumed highly abstract and profoundly theoretical, behind which there are some risks: more and more distant from ordinary people, the blurred boundary from mathematics and subject as defined in the wrong. Where is logic going, and should it? The purpose of logic is how to make us thinking in effective ways so that right or wrong can be determined. The study of logic should also return to this universal significance, only by this logic can be publicly accepted, and the power of logic can be revealed.
作者 廖德明
出处 《太原师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第3期29-31,共3页 Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词 逻辑 思维 生活 logic thinking life
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1C.S.Peirce.Reasoning andthe Logic of Things.The Cambridge Con-ferences Lectures of1898[]..1992
  • 2Johan van Benthem.Logic and Reasoning:Do the Facts Matter-[].Studia Logica.2007
  • 3J.van Benthem.Cognition as Interaction,Cognitive Foundation ofIn-terpretation[]..2007
  • 4J.van Benthem.Logic Games:not just tools,but model ofinteraction[]..2007
  • 5Parikh,R.The logic of games and its applications[].Annals of Discrete Mathematics.1985

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部