期刊文献+

Gamma钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折出血量的比较

Comparison of the Amount of Gamma Bleeding use in Intertrochanter Fracture of femur Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨髋加压滑动螺钉和Gamma钉手术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折手术出血量的差别。方法回顾性对比分析了53例股骨粗隆间骨折行髋加压滑动螺钉和Gamma钉手术出血量。结果DHS组的30例病人的术中出血量为(605±117)mL,术后引流量为(54±12)mL,合计为(659±121)mL;Gamma钉组的23例病人的术中出血量为(290±66)mL,术后引流量为(56±11)mL,合计为(346±66)mL。结果Gamma钉组比DHS组的术中出血量要少(P<0.05),术后引流量无统计学差别(P>0.05),2组的合计出血量相比Gamma钉组比DHS组的术中出血量要少(P<0.05)。结论Gamma钉手术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折比髋加压滑动螺钉手术出血量少。 Objective To investigate the amount of two operation methods' bleeding in intertrochantor fracture of femur surgery. Methods Retrospectively analyse the 53 cases of the intertrochanter fracture of femur in our hospital: comparison of the amount bleeding of dynamic hip screw (DHS) operation and Gamma nail operation. Results In 30 cases of dynamic hip screw(DHS) operation, operative bleeding: 290 ± 66mL,drainage: (54 ± 12)mL,total:(659 ± 121)mLiin 23 cases of Gamma nail operation,operative bleeding: (605±117)mL,drainage: (56 ±11)mL,total:(346 ±66)mL.In group Gamma nail, operative bleeding and total bleeding is less than in group dynamic hip screw(P〈0.05).Two group cases' drainage was no statistical difference(P〉0.05).Conclusion The amount of operative bleeding Gamma nail operation is less than Gamma nail operation in intertrochanter fracture of femur surgery.
出处 《中外医疗》 2009年第14期12-13,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 股骨粗隆间骨折 髋加压滑动螺钉 GAMMA钉 手术出血量 Intortrochanter fracture of femur Dynamic hip screw(DHS):Gamma nail The amount of operative bleeding
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Kitamura S, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S, et al. Functional outcome after hip fracture in Japan[J].Clin Orthop,1998,(348):29-36.
  • 2Gullberg B, Johell O, Kanis JA. Word-wide projections for hip fracture[J]. Osteoporos Int,1997,7(5):407-413.
  • 3Haidukewych GJ,Israel TA,Berry DJ.Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur[J].J Bone Joint Surg (Am),2001,83(5):643- 650.
  • 4张经纬,蒋垚,张先龙,冯建翔,杨立峰,赵刘军,吴志军,黄雷,曾炳芳.股骨转子间骨折不同手术方法比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(1):7-11. 被引量:389
  • 5Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, et al.Treament of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or 95ia screw-plate[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 2002,84:372- 381.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Jensen JS, Miehaelsen M. Troehanteric femoral fractures treated with McLaughlin Osteosynthesis. Acta Orthop Stand, 1975, 46: 795-803.
  • 2Parker M J, Palmer CR. A nev, mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1993, 75: 797-798.
  • 3Kitamura S. Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S. et al. Functional outcome after hip fracture in Japan. Clin Orthop, 1998, (348): 29-36.
  • 4Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Kelleer MS. Early fixation reduces morbidity and mortalilv in elderly patients with hip fractures from low-impact falls. J Trauma, 1995, 39: 261-265.
  • 5Baixauli F, Vicent V, Baixauli E, et al. A reinforced rigid fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop. 1999,(361): 205-215.
  • 6Parker MJ. Trochanteric hip fractures: fixation failure commoner with femoral medialization: a comparison of 101 cases. Acta Orthop Seand, 1996, 67: 329-332.
  • 7Simmermacher RK, Rosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail(PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fracture. Injury, 1999. 30: 327-332.
  • 8Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, et at. Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or 95 ° screw-plate. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2002,84: 372-381.
  • 9Herrra A. Domingo LJ, Catvo A, et at. A comparative study of the trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail or the proximal nail. Int Orthop, 2002, 26: 365-369.
  • 10Buciuto R, Hammer R, RAB-plate versus sliding hip screws for unstable trochanteric hip fractures: stabitity of the fixation amt modes of failure-radiographic analysis of 218 fractures. J Trauma, 2001,50: 545-550.

共引文献388

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部