期刊文献+

BiodMHC:an online server for the prediction of MHC class Ⅱ-peptide binding affinity

BiodMHC:an online server for the prediction of MHC class Ⅱ-peptide binding affinity
原文传递
导出
摘要 Effective identification of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules restricted peptides is a critical step in discovering immune epitopes. Although many online servers have been built to predict class Ⅱ MHC-peptide binding affinity, they have been trained on different datasets, and thus fail in providing a unified comparison of various methods. In this paper, we present our implementation of seven popular predictive methods, namely SMM-align, ARB, SVR-pairwise, Gibbs sampler. ProPred, LP-top2, and MHCPred, on a single web server named BiodMHC (http://biod.whu.edu.cn/BiodMHC/index.html, the software is available upon request). Using a standard measure of AUC (Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curves), we compare these methods by means of not only cross validation but also prediction on independent test datasets. We find that SMM-align, ProPred, SVR-pairwise, ARB, and Gibbs sampler are the five best-performing methods. For the binding affinity prediction of class Ⅱ MHC-peptide, BiodMHC provides a convenient online platform for researchers to obtain binding information simultaneously using various methods. Effective identification of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules restricted peptides is a critical step in discovering immune epitopes. Although many online servers have been built to predict class Ⅱ MHC-peptide binding affinity, they have been trained on different datasets, and thus fail in providing a unified comparison of various methods. In this paper, we present our implementation of seven popular predictive methods, namely SMM-align, ARB, SVR-pairwise, Gibbs sampler. ProPred, LP-top2, and MHCPred, on a single web server named BiodMHC (http://biod.whu.edu.cn/BiodMHC/index.html, the software is available upon request). Using a standard measure of AUC (Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curves), we compare these methods by means of not only cross validation but also prediction on independent test datasets. We find that SMM-align, ProPred, SVR-pairwise, ARB, and Gibbs sampler are the five best-performing methods. For the binding affinity prediction of class Ⅱ MHC-peptide, BiodMHC provides a convenient online platform for researchers to obtain binding information simultaneously using various methods.
出处 《Journal of Genetics and Genomics》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第5期289-296,共8页 遗传学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No.60773010) the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China (No.08DZ2271800 and 09DZ2272800)
关键词 MHC MHC-peptide binding predictions web server MHC Ⅱ MHC-peptide binding predictions web server
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Bui, H.H., Sidney, J., Peters, B., Sathiamurthy, M., Sinichi, A., Purton, K.A., Mothe, B.R., Chisari, F.V., Watkins, D.I., and Sette, A. (2005). Automated generation and evaluation of specific MHC binding predictive tools: ARB matrix applications. Immunogenetics 57:304-314.
  • 2Carson, R.T., Vignali, K.M., Woodland, D.L., and Vignali, D.A. (1997). T cell receptor recognition of MHC class Ⅱ-bound peptide flanking residues enhances immunogenicity and results in altered TCR V region usage. Immunity 7: 387-399.
  • 3Doytchinova, I.A., and Flower, D.R. (2003). Towards the in silico identification of class Ⅱ restricted T-cell epitopes: A partial least squares iterative self-consistent algorithm for affinity prediction Bioinformatics 19: 2263-2270.
  • 4Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G. (2001). Pattern classification. (New York: Wiley).
  • 5Guan, P., Doytchinova, I.A., Zygouri, C., and Flower, D.R. (2003). MHCPred: A server for quantitative prediction of peptide-MHC binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3621-3624.
  • 6Henseler, M., and Kaplan, A.M. (2004). A beginner's guide to partial least square analysis. Understanding Statistics 3: 283-297.
  • 7Liao, L., and Noble, W.S. (2003). Combining pairwise sequence similarity and support vector machines for detecting remote protein evolutionary and structural relationships. J. Comput. Biol. 10: 857-868.
  • 8Murugan, N., and Dai, Y. (2005). Prediction of MHC class Ⅱ binding peptides based on an iterative learning model. Immunome Res. 1: 6.
  • 9Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., and Lund, O. (2007). Prediction of MHC class Ⅱ binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 238.
  • 10Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., Worning, P., Hvid, C.S., Lamberth, K., Buus, S., Brunak, S., and Lund, O. (2004). Improved prediction of MHC class I and class II epitopes using a novel Gibbs sampling approach. Bioinformatics 20: 1388-1397.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部