摘要
正统的哥本哈根解释因其语义的不一致性受到置疑,非正统解释中最节省的系综解释、本体论解释、多世界解释、模态解释、退相干解释重构了量子力学解释。它们在语义中的解释力与附加性要求都不相同。从解释力强弱与附加性要求两个视角比较这些解释,加深对各种量子力学解释的认识,既是整体科学知识的需要,也是理论语义上一致性的需要。
Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is criticized for its semantic inconsistence. The minimal ensemble interpretation, ontological interpretation, many- worlds interpretation, modal interpretation and decoherence interpretation reconstruct quantummechanics interpretation. They have different additional requirements and explanation force. Comparing the six interpretations from additional requirements and explanation force can deepen our understandings, which is not only the need of whole science knowledge , but also the need of semantic consistence.
出处
《河池学院学报》
2009年第2期37-41,共5页
Journal of Hechi University
关键词
量子力学解释
比较
解释力
附加性要求
interpretation of quantum mechanics
comparison
additional requirement