期刊文献+

废物水泥窑共处置产品中重金属释放量研究 被引量:10

Release Amount of Heavy Metals in Cement Product from Co-processing Waste in Cement Kiln
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过模拟煅烧实验制取水泥熟料,并采用国标GB/T 17671-1999制取混凝土样品.选用EA NEN7371和EA NEN7375浸出方法,利用基于菲克扩散第二定律的一维扩散模型对废物水泥窑共处置产品(混凝土)中重金属长期累积释放量进行了研究.结果表明,混凝土中重金属的最大释放量低于总量;各种重金属在混凝土中的扩散系数不同,且Cr>As>Ni>Cd;Cr、As、Ni和Cd 30a的累积释放量分别为4.43、0.46、1.50和0.02 mg/kg,释放率(累积释放量/最大释放量)分别为27.0%、18.0%、3.0%和0.2%;扩散系数是影响重金属累积释放量的重要因素,且两者表现出较好的相关性;Cr和As的扩散系数较大(分别为1.15E-15 m2/s和6.42E-16 m2/s),应重点控制其进入水泥窑处置过程的总量. Clinker was produced by Simulating cement calcination test, and concrete samples were also prepared according to national standard GB/T 17671-1999. Long-term cumulative release amount of heavy metals in cement product from co-processing waste in cement kiln was researched through leaching test which refers to EA NEN 7371 and EA NEN7375, and one-dimensional diffusion model which is on the base of Fick diffusion law. The results show that availabilities of heavy metals are lower than the total amounts in concrete. The diffusion coefficients of heavy metals are different(Cr 〉 As 〉 Ni 〉 Cd). During 30 years service, the cumulative release amounts of Cr, As, Ni and Cd are 4.43 mg/kg, 0.46 mg/kg, 1.50 mg/kg and 0. 02 mg/kg, respectively, and the ratios of release which is the division of cumulative release amount and availability are 27.0 %, 18.0 %, 3.0 % and 0. 2 %, respectively. The most important influence factor of cumulative release amount of heavy metal is the diffusion coefficient, and it is correlative to cumulative release amount. The diffusion coefficient of Cr and As should be controlled exactly in the processing of input the cement-kiln.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期1539-1544,共6页 Environmental Science
基金 “十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2007BAC16B03,2006BAC02A19)
关键词 水泥产品 重金属 释放模型 累积释放量 水泥窑共处置 cement product heavy metal release model cumulative release amount cement kiln co-processing
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1张霞,花明,黄启飞,周奇,王琪.固体废物水泥窑共处置技术的现状及发展[J].再生资源研究,2007(4):37-40. 被引量:30
  • 2朱雪梅,刘建国,黄启飞,王琪.固体废物水泥窑共处置技术应用及存在问题[J].中国水泥,2006(4):45-49. 被引量:46
  • 3Mokrzycki E, Uliasz-Boche czyk A, Sarna M. Use of alternative fuels in the Polish cement industry [ J ]. Applied Energy, 2003,74( 1 ) : 101- 111.
  • 4王琪.危险废物鉴别与处置工程技术规范研究[R].北京:中国环境科学研究院,2000.
  • 5Trezza M A, Scian A N. Waste with chrome in Portland cement clinker production[ J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007,147 ( 1- 2) : 188-196.
  • 6Petkovic G, Engelsen C J, Breedveld G, et al. Environmental impact from the use of recycled materials in road construction: method for decision-making in Norway I J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2004,42 (3) : 249-264.
  • 7Aubert J E, Husson B, Sarramone N. Utilization of municipal solid waste incineration (MSW/) fly ash in blended cement Part 2. Mechanical strength of mortars and environmental impact[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007,146(1-2) : 12-19.
  • 8Peter N D, Lorne A G. Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment : Improving explorations of the future [ J ]. Environmental impact Assessment Review, 2007,27 (3) : 206-219.
  • 9Kosson D S, van der Sloot H A, Sanchez F, et al. An integrated framework for evaluating leaching in waste management and utilization of secondary materials [ J ]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2002, 19(3) : 159-204.
  • 10Van der Sloot H A. Comparison of the characteristic leaching behavior of cements using standard (EN 196-1 ) cement mortar and an assessment of their long-term environmental behavior in construction products during service life and recycling[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000,30(7) : 1079-1096.

二级参考文献26

共引文献74

同被引文献191

引证文献10

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部