摘要
本文通过对海门电厂侧煤仓方案和常规炉前煤仓方案的煤仓间、四大管道及输煤系统等方面的造价进行分析和比较,论证了海门电厂采用的侧煤仓间并结合管带机穿烟囱的方案具有更显著的经济效益,并对煤仓间布置方案的选择提出了建议。
Through analyzed and comparison on the cost of bunker room, four main pipes, coal handling system of side bunker room and front bunker room in Haimen Power Plant, it is pointed out that side bunker room in combination with tubular-beh type conveyor through the chinmey in Haimen Power Plant obtained better profit, and some suggests about the layouts of bunker room are given.
出处
《科技信息》
2009年第11期317-318,共2页
Science & Technology Information
关键词
侧煤仓间
炉前煤仓间
输煤栈桥
输煤管带机
四大管道
框剪结构
Side Bunker Room
Front Bunker Room
Coal Handling Gallery-
Tubular-beh Type Conveyor
Four Main Pipes
The Frame and Shearing Stress Structure
