期刊文献+

苹果实生树嫩芽阶段转变相关蛋白质的SDS-PAGE分析 被引量:1

SDS-PAGE analysis of phase-transition-related proteins in buds of apple trees
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳技术(SDS-PAGE)分析了5株苹果杂种实生树(红玉×金冠)嫩芽中蛋白质含量随节位升高的动态变化。结果表明,随节位升高蛋白质带发生变化,共发现6条阶段转变相关蛋白质带,分子量估算值分别为17.5、19、33、38、51和55 ku。其中55 ku蛋白质表现为定性变化,随着节位的升高,46节出现,之后保持不变,到达125节后又突然消失。17.5、19、33、38和51 ku等5种蛋白质是定量变化。17.5、33、38和51 ku等4种蛋白质在低节位时含量较低,到达一定节位时突然升高,到达较高节位时又突然降低;19 ku蛋白质在5株实生树上的变化趋势不一致,但定量变化的临界点与上述5种蛋白质相同。 Dynamic changes of proteins in buds from different nodes of 5 apple hybrid seedlings (Jonathan xGolden Delicious) were analyzed with SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The result indicated that protein bands changed with nodes along a seedling. 6 protein bands presented differences in different ontogenetic phases. The molecular weights of the 6 protein bands were 17.5 ku, 19 ku,33 ku,38 ku,51 ku and 55 ku respectively. The 55 ku protein presented a qualitative change,which appeared in the node No. 46 and disappeared above the node No. 125. Changes of the other 5 proteins 17.5 ku, 19 ku, 33 ku, 38 ku and 51 ku were quantitative. Contents of the 17.5 ku, 33 ku, 38 ku and 51 ku proteins were low in samples of the lower part of the seedling, when they reached a certain node, the proteins increased to a higher level, and they got to lower level again in higher nodes. Changing tendency of 19 ku in the 5 seedlings was different but critic point of quantitative change was the same with the former 5 proteins.
出处 《果树学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期375-378,共4页 Journal of Fruit Science
基金 河北省自然科学基金(C2007000967)
关键词 苹果 阶段转变 蛋白质 SDS—PAGE Apple Phase change Protein SDS-PAGE
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1SNOWBALL A M, ZEMAN A M, TCHAN Y T, MILLINS M G, GOODWIN P B. Phase change in citrus: immunologically detectable differences between juvenile and mature plants[J]. J Austr Plant Physiol, 1991, 18:385-396.
  • 2ATHERTON J G, YEH D M, TUCKER G A. Timing of the protein chaxxges during phase transition in Cineraria[J]. Hort Sci Bio, 1998, 73(1): 35-38.
  • 3BRAND M H, LINEBERGER R D. In vitro rejuvenation of Betula: biochemical evaluation[J]. Amer J Bot, 1992, 79: 626-635.
  • 4AMO-MARCO J B, VIDAL N, VIEITEZ A M, BALLESTER A. Polypeptide markers differentiating juvenile and adult tissues in chestnut[J]. Plant Physiol, 1993, 142: 117-119.
  • 5KUO Jung-heh, HUANG Hao-jen, CHENG Ching-ming, CHEN Li-jing, HUANG Bau-lima, HUANG Li-chun, KUO Tsong-teh. Rejuvenation in vitro: modulation of protein phosphorylation in Sequoiasempervirens[J]. Plant Physiol, 1995, 146: 333-336.
  • 6HUANG L C, PU S Y, MURASHIGE T, FU S F, KUO T T, HUANG D D ,HUANG H J. Phase-and age-related differences in protein tyrosine phosphorylation in Sequoiasempervirens[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2003, 47 (4): 601-603.
  • 7BON M C. J16: An apex protein associated with juvenility of Sequoiadendron giganteum[J]. Tree Physiol, 1988, 4(4): 381-387.
  • 8BESFORD R T,HAND P,PEPPITY S D,RICHARDSON C M, THOMS B. Phase change in Prunus avium: differences between juvenile and mature shoots identified by 2-dimensional protein separation and invitro translation of Mma[J]. Plant Physiol, 1996, 147:534 -538.
  • 9HAND P,BESFORD R T,RICHARDSON M,PEPPITT S D. Antibodies to phase related proteins in juvenile and mature Prunus avium [J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 1996, 20: 25-29.
  • 10曾广娟,李春敏,张新忠,田义,陈东玫,赵永波,董文轩.苹果实生树阶段转变特异蛋白质的SDS-PAGE分析[J].园艺学报,2008,35(7):1059-1064. 被引量:11

二级参考文献15

  • 1Amo-Marco J B, Vidal N, Vieitez A M, Ballester A. 1993. Polypeptide markers differentiating juvenile and adult tissues in chestnut. J Plant Physiol, 142 : 117 - 119.
  • 2Besford R T, Hand P, Peppitt S D, Richardson C M, Thomas B. 1996. Phase change in Prunas avium: Differences between juvenile and mature shoots identified by 2-dimensional protein separation and in vitro translation of mRNA. J Plant Physiol, 147:534 -538.
  • 3Bon M C. 1988. J16: An apex protein associated with juvenility of Sequoiadendron giganteum. Tree Physiol, 4 (4) : 381 -387.
  • 4Garcia J L, Avidan N, Troncoso A, Sarmiento R, Lavee S. 2000. Possible juvenile-related proteins in olive tree tissues. Sci Holt, 85:271 - 284.
  • 5Hackett W P. 1983. Phase change and intra-clonal variability. Hortscience, 18 (6) : 840 -844.
  • 6Hackett W P, Murray J, Woo H. 1991. Cellular biochemical and molecular analysis of maturation related characteristics in Hedera helix. //Ahyja M R. Woody Plant Biotechnology. New York: Plenum Press: 77 -81.
  • 7Hand P, Besford R T, Richardson C W, Peppitt S D. 1996. Antibodies to phase related proteins in juvenile and mature Prunus avium. Plant Growth Regulation, 20:25 -29.
  • 8Huang L C, Pu S Y, Murashige T, Fu S F, Kuo T T, Huang D D, Huang H J. 2003. Phase-and age-related differences in protein tyrosine phosphorylation in Sequoia sempervirens. Biol Plant, 47 (4) : 601 -603.
  • 9Kuo J L, Huang H J, Cheng C M, Chen L J, Huang B L, Huang L C, Kuo T T. 1995. Rejuvenation in vitro: Modulation of protein phosphorylation in Sequoia sempervirens. J Plant Physiol, 146:333 -336.
  • 10Poethig R S. 1990. Phase change and the regulation of shoot moephogenesis in plants. Science, 250:923 -930.

共引文献10

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部