摘要
目的比较单纯西药治疗与刺络拔罐加贴棉灸(梅花针、刺络拔罐、贴棉灸)治疗带状疱疹的疗效。方法将74例胸胁部患带状疱疹患者随机分为治疗组(刺络拔罐加贴棉灸)和对照组(西药治疗)。治疗组采用局部梅花针叩刺,拔罐,贴棉灸治疗;对照组采用口服阿昔洛韦、去痛片,外涂酞丁胺治疗。结果治疗组痊愈和总显效率分别为68.4%和92.1%,对照组痊愈和总显效率分别为41.7%和66.7%,两者比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论刺络拔罐加贴棉灸治疗的疗效明显优于对照组,起效快,疗程短,并可减少后遗神经痛的发生。
Objective To compare the efficacy of pricking-cupping bloodletting method plus cotton moxibustion (plum-blossom needle, pricking-cupping bloodletting and cotton moxibustion) with simple Western drug treatment in treating herpes zoster. Methods Seven-four patients with thoracochondriac herpes zoster were randomly allocated to a treatment group (pricking-cupping bloodletting method plus cotton moxibustion) and a control group (Western drug treatment). The treatment group received local plum-blossom needle tapping, cupping and cottorL moxibustion and the control group, oral administration of Aciclovir and Compound Aminopyrine Phenacetin Tablets and external application of Ftibamzone. Results The cure rate and the total marked efficacy rate were 68.4% and 92.1%, respectively, in the treatment group and 41.7% and 66.7%, respectively, in the treatment group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.01). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of pricking-cupping bloodletting method plus cotton moxibustion is obviously better than that of Western drug treatment. It produces a quick effect, shortens the course of treatment and decreases the occurrence of neuralgia as a sequela.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2009年第5期270-271,共2页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
疱疹
带状
刺血疗法
拔罐
贴棉灸
Herpes, zoster
Pricking bloodletting method
Cupping
Cotton moxibustion