期刊文献+

白内障超声乳化术联合四种人工晶状体植入术后视力满意率分析

Assessment of postoperative visual satisfaction in pseudophakia with different intraocular lenses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较白内障超声乳化联合PMMA人工晶状体(MZ30BD)、蓝光滤过型Acrysof Natural人工晶状体(SN60AT),Acrysof IQ非球面人工晶状体(SN60WF)和多焦点Restore(SN60D3)人工晶状体植入术后视力满意率。方法:白内障超声乳化术患者334例,根据植入人工晶状体类型分为4组:PMMA组(98例)、Natural组(106例)、IQ组(110例)及Restore组(20例),于术后1,3,6mo随访调查患者术后的视力满意率(分为非常满意、基本满意、尚可和失望),比较术后同一时段各组满意率的不同以及各组术后满意率在不同时段的差异。结果:以非常满意和基本满意合计总满意率。术后1moPMMA组、Natural组、IQ组及Restore组视力满意率分别为85.7%,66.0%,60.0%和45.0%;术后3mo为77.6%,68.9%,83.6%和80.0%;术后6mo为76.5%,71.7%,85.5%和80.0%。术后1mo4组的术后视力满意率存在显著性差异(P<0.05);术后3mo4组的术后视力满意率无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后6mo4组的术后视力满意率无显著性差异(P>0.05)。PMMA组3次随访的术后视力满意率无显著性差异(P>0.05);Natural组3次随访的术后视力满意率无显著性差异(P>0.05);IQ组3次随访的术后视力满意率存在显著性差异(P<0.05);Restore组3次随访的术后视力满意率存在显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:超乳术后视力满意率因植入人工晶状体的不同而不同,而且随着时间的推移而发生变化。 AIM: To compare postoperative visual satisfaction in patients who had performed phacoemulsification and implantation of different types of intraocular lenses(IOL). METHODS: There are 334 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and different types of IOLs implantation. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the types of IOL. Group PMMA included 98 patients implanted with PMMA IOL(MZ30BD) ; group Natural included 106 patients implanted with blue-light filtering Arcysof Natural IOL(SN60AT) ;group IQ included 110 patients implanted with non-spherical surface Arcysof IQ IOL(SN60WF) and group Restore included 20 patients received multifocal IOL of Restore. All patients after phacoemulsification 1 month, 3 months and 6 months were inquired satisfaction of vision to find the difference of visual satisfaction among the 4 groups. RESULTS: Patients' satisfaction of postoperative 1 month in PMMA group, Natural group, IQ group and Restore group is 85. 7%, 66. 0%, 60. 0% and 45. 0% respectively. Patients' satisfaction of postoperative 3 months is 77.6% ,68.9%, 83.6% and 80.0% respectively. Patients' satisfaction of postoperative 6 months is 76.5%, 71.7%, 85.5% and 80.0%. CONCLUSION: The postoperative visual satisfaction are different with types of IOL implantation and sessions after surgery.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2009年第5期869-871,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 超声乳化吸出术 视力满意率 人工晶状体 phacoemulsification vision satisfaction intraocular lenses
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献44

  • 1贺玲,郑晓龙.白内障超声乳化手术前后的社会医学和心理学分析[J].眼科,2005,14(1):33-35. 被引量:5
  • 2何守志.略论眼内屈光矫正手术的利与弊[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,41(3):193-195. 被引量:1
  • 3Sanchez-Galeana CA, Smith R J, Sanders DR, et al. Lens opacities after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation.Ophthalmology, 2003,110 : 781-785.
  • 4Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003,29 :1307-1312.
  • 5Langenbucher A, Huber S, Nguyen NX, et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg,2003 ,29 :677-685.
  • 6Tsuneoka H, Shiba T, Takahashi Y. Ultrasonic phacoemulsification using a 1.4 mm incision: clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg,2002,28:81-86.
  • 7Pandey SK, Werner L, Agarwal A, et al. Phakonit cataract removal through a sub-1.0 mm incision and implantation of the ThinOptX rollable intraoeular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002,28 : 1710-1713.
  • 8Artal P, Berrio E, Guirao A, et al. Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age. J Opt Soc Am A 2002; 19:137-143
  • 9Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, et al. Changes in corneal wavefront aberrations with aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1351-1355
  • 10Roberto B, Antonio S, Lucio Bet al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:712-717

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部